期刊文献+

Investigation of long-term implantation of BuMA stent in a porcine coronary model 被引量:6

Investigation of long-term implantation of BuMA stent in a porcine coronary model
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Stent-based delivery of sirolimus has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia significantly. However, the long-term effect of the polymer is thought to initiate and sustain an inflammatory response and contribute to the occurrence of late complications. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (BSES) for inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model. Methods Four types of stents were implanted at random in different coronary arteries of the same pig: BSES (n=24), bare metal stent (BMS) (n=24), biodegradable polymer coated stent without drug (PCS) (n=24) and only poly (n-butyl methacrylate) base layer coated stent (EGS) (n=23). In total, 26 animals underwent successful random placement of 95 oversized stents in the coronary arteries. Coronary angiography was performed after 28 days, 90 days and 240 days of stent implantation. After 14 days, 28 days, 90 days and 240 days, 6 animals at each timepoint were sacrificed for histomorphologic analysis. Results The 28-day, 90-day and 240-day results of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) showed reduction in luminal loss (LL) in the BSES group when compared with the BMS group; (0.20±0.35) mm vs. (0.82±0.51) mm (P=-0.035), (0.20±0.30) mm vs. (0.93±0.51) mm (P=-0.013), and (0.18±0.16) mm vs. (0.19±0.24) mm (P=0.889), respectively. By 28-day, 90-day and 240-day histomorphomeric analysis results, there was also a corresponding significant reduction in neointimal tissue proliferation with similar injury scores of BSES compared with the BMS control; average neointimal area (0.90±0.49) mm2 vs. (2.16±1.29) mm2 (P=0.049), (1.53±0.84) mm2 vs. (3.41±1.55) mm2 (P=-0.026), and (2.43±0.95) mm2 vs. (3.12±1.16) mm2 (P=0.228), respectively. High magnification histomorphologic examination revealed similar inflammation scores and endothelialization scores in both the BSES and BMS groups. Conclusions The BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stents can significantly reduce neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis. Re-endothelialization of the BuMA stent is as good as that of the BMS in the porcine coronary model due to the reduced inflammation response to the BuMA stent. Background Stent-based delivery of sirolimus has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia significantly. However, the long-term effect of the polymer is thought to initiate and sustain an inflammatory response and contribute to the occurrence of late complications. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (BSES) for inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model. Methods Four types of stents were implanted at random in different coronary arteries of the same pig: BSES (n=24), bare metal stent (BMS) (n=24), biodegradable polymer coated stent without drug (PCS) (n=24) and only poly (n-butyl methacrylate) base layer coated stent (EGS) (n=23). In total, 26 animals underwent successful random placement of 95 oversized stents in the coronary arteries. Coronary angiography was performed after 28 days, 90 days and 240 days of stent implantation. After 14 days, 28 days, 90 days and 240 days, 6 animals at each timepoint were sacrificed for histomorphologic analysis. Results The 28-day, 90-day and 240-day results of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) showed reduction in luminal loss (LL) in the BSES group when compared with the BMS group; (0.20±0.35) mm vs. (0.82±0.51) mm (P=-0.035), (0.20±0.30) mm vs. (0.93±0.51) mm (P=-0.013), and (0.18±0.16) mm vs. (0.19±0.24) mm (P=0.889), respectively. By 28-day, 90-day and 240-day histomorphomeric analysis results, there was also a corresponding significant reduction in neointimal tissue proliferation with similar injury scores of BSES compared with the BMS control; average neointimal area (0.90±0.49) mm2 vs. (2.16±1.29) mm2 (P=0.049), (1.53±0.84) mm2 vs. (3.41±1.55) mm2 (P=-0.026), and (2.43±0.95) mm2 vs. (3.12±1.16) mm2 (P=0.228), respectively. High magnification histomorphologic examination revealed similar inflammation scores and endothelialization scores in both the BSES and BMS groups. Conclusions The BuMA biodegradable drug-coated sirolimus-eluting stents can significantly reduce neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis. Re-endothelialization of the BuMA stent is as good as that of the BMS in the porcine coronary model due to the reduced inflammation response to the BuMA stent.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第22期4083-4087,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 biodegradable polymer electro-grafting base layer drug-eluting stent porcine coronary model biodegradable polymer electro-grafting base layer drug-eluting stent porcine coronary model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Isenberg MJ. A hierarctlical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. Lancet,2004,364:583- 591.
  • 2Sousa JE, Costa MA, Sousa AG, et al. Two-year angiographic and intravaseular ultrasound follow-up after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in human coronary arteries. Circulation, 2003,107:381-383.
  • 3Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med, 2002,346:1773-1780.
  • 4Moses J, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med, 2003,349:1315-1323.
  • 5Stogie GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary" artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2004,350:221-231.
  • 6Vimlani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: Should we be cautious? Circulation,2004, 109:701- 705.
  • 7Virmani R, Farb A, Guagliumi G, et al. Drug-eluting stents: Caution and concerns for long-term outcome. Coron Artery Dis, 2004,15:313-331.
  • 8McFadden EP, Stabile E, Regar E, et al. Lale thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet, 2004,364 : 1519-1521.
  • 9Fernandez C, Hernandez R. Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: Resuits from a pooled analysis including 10 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,45 ;954-959.
  • 10Wessely R, ttausleiter J, Michaelis C, et al. Inhibition of neointima for mation by a novel drug-eluting stent system that allows for doseadjustable, multiple, and on-site stent coating. Arterioseler Thromb Vasc Biol,2005 ,25 :748 -753.

共引文献3

同被引文献21

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部