期刊文献+

基于涌现鉴别的安全性分析 被引量:2

Safety analysis based on emergence identification
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 工程上对系统要素潜在危险交互作用的鉴别方法有迫切需求。论述了工程系统安全性是一种涌现特性,指出应将其作为复杂系统问题来开展研究。综合运用复杂性研究成果、功能模拟原理、目标树-成功树建模技术,提出了基于一体化安全风险模型开展涌现鉴别研究的基本方法。结合"阿波罗15号"飞船案例,验证了基于安全风险模型开展涌现鉴别的适用性。研究成果为解决复杂工程系统安全性问题提供了新的思路和分析手段。 It is in urgent need of the new analysis methods that are used to identify the potential hazardous interactions among components in the engineering system. After discussing the engineering system safety as an emergent property, the paper suggests that the research on safety should be viewed as a complex system problem. By means of the complexity theory, functional modeling principle, and goal tree-success tree modeling technique, a method based on the integrated safety risk model is presented for investigating and identifying the emergence. Taking the Apollo 15 spaceship incident as an example, the model is illustrated in the application of identifying emergence. As a result of that, the proposed modeling method is demonstrated to be an alternative way of solving the safety problem in complex engineering systems.
作者 龚时雨
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期2401-2406,共6页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
关键词 系统安全工程 安全性模型 目标树-成功树 潜在交互 system safety engineering safety model goal tree-success tree potential interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Leveson N G. A new accident model for engineering safer sys- tems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4) : 237 - 270.
  • 2Leveson N G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn fromevents[J].Safety Science, 2011, 49(1): 55-64.
  • 3Bakolas E, Saleh J H. Augmenting defense-in-depth with the concepts of observability and diagnosability from control theory and discrete events systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(1) : 184 - 193.
  • 4Qureshi Z H. A review of accident modeling approaches for com- plex critical socioteehnical systems [R]. Edinburgh= De fence Science and Technology Organisation , 2008.
  • 5Saleh J H, Marais K B, Bakolas E, et al. Highlights from the literature on accident causation and system safety: review of ma- jor ideas, recent contributions, and challenges[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010, 95(11) : 1105 - 1116.
  • 6Kurtoglu T, Tumer I Y, Jensen D C. A functional failure rea- soning methodology for evaluation of conceptual system architec- tures[J]. Research on Engineering Design, 2010, 21(4):209 - 234.
  • 7Kurtoglu T, Tumer I Y. A graph-based fault identification and prop- agation framework for functional design of complex systems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 2008, 130(5): 1-8.
  • 8Ghemraoui R, Mathieu L, Tricot N. Design method for system-atic safety integration[J]. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Tech- nology, 2009, 58(1):161-164.
  • 9Sklet S. Safety barriers: definition, classification and perform- ance[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(4): 494-506.
  • 10Guillerm R, Demmou H, Sadou N. Safety evaluation of com- plex system integration in system engineering process[C]// Proc. of the 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 2010: 559-562.

二级参考文献24

  • 1王飞跃.计算实验方法与复杂系统行为分析和决策评估[J].系统仿真学报,2004,16(5):893-897. 被引量:149
  • 2赵宏展,徐向东.危险源的概念辨析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):65-70. 被引量:68
  • 3Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high-risk technology[M]. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1984.
  • 4Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270.
  • 5Kohda T, Takagi Y. Accident cause analysis of complex systems based on safety control functions[M]. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006:570-576.
  • 6Rasmussen J, Svedung I. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society[M]. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, 2000.
  • 7Kletz T A. Human problems with computer control[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1982, 1(4): 209-211.
  • 8WASH-1400:Reactor Safety Study[R].NUREG -75/014,US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,Washington,DC,USA,1975
  • 9Kumamoto H,Henley EJ.Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists[M].2nd ed.IEEE Press,1996
  • 10Meshkat L,Shapiro A.Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Concurrent,Conceptual Design of Space Missions[R].AIAA2005-6765

共引文献5

同被引文献35

  • 1杜纯,汪送,王瑛,管明露.复杂系统安全涌现及其控制策略研究[J].工业安全与环保,2013,39(7):34-37. 被引量:5
  • 2何学秋.事物安全演化过程的基本理论研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2005,1(1):5-10. 被引量:11
  • 3张我华,王军,孙林柱,等.灾害系统与灾变动力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
  • 4Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237 -270.
  • 5Leveson N G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events[J]. Safety Science, 2011,49( 1 ):55 -64.
  • 6Haimes Y Y. Hierarchical holographic modeling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1981 (9) : 606 -617.
  • 7MIL-HDBK-764, System engineering design guide for army material[S]. 1990.
  • 8Uchitel S, Kramer J, Magee J. Synthesis of behavioral models from scenarios[J]. IEEE Trans on Software Engineering, 2003, 29(2): 99- 115.
  • 9杨洁.基于业务流程的层次化信息安全风险评估方法研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2005.
  • 10Jamshidi M. System of systems engineering: Innovations for the 218t century[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009:2.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部