期刊文献+

鸦片战争若干问题考辨 被引量:2

Discussion on Some Issues about the Opium War
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以军事手段封锁一国海岸线,显然属于战争行为。1840年6月22日,英军宣布封锁广东沿海海岸线,也就宣告了战争的开始。懿律到达广东的时间应是1840年6月30日,而不是28日。定海之战中,张朝发受伤而死,应是鸦片战争中第一个为国捐躯的高级将官。《穿鼻草约》根本不存在,义律与琦善达成的所谓共识也不足以成为英军侵占香港的理据。关于虎门大战前后琦善裁撤军备、不增援的说法可能来自于骆秉章的一份奏折。琦善可能是最先认识到英军能够陆战之人。三元里抗英斗争发生时余保纯应为署广州府知府,而不是广州府知府。在英船沉没的问题上,姚莹、达洪阿确有不实虚夸之词。 Blockading the coast of other country's by military means apparently is one kind of war act. In June 22, 1840, when the British declared blockading Guangdong coast line, the war started. The time that George Elliot arrived in Guangdong should be June 30, 1840 instead of June 28. In Dinghai battles, ZHANG Zhao-fa was injured and later died in Zhenhai. He was actually the first senior general who died for his country in the Opium War. As Convention of Chuenpeh does not exist, the consensus between QI Shah and Charles Elliot did not constitute the basis for the British occupation of Hong Kong. The statement that QI Shah demolished the arms and retreated the troops during Humen battles could come from a memorial submitted to the Emperor by LUO Bing-zhang. In the Opium War QI Shan was probably the first man to recognize that the British Army could fight on land. When anti-British struggles occurred in Sanyuanli, YU Bao-chun was the shadow deputy Guangzhou Zhifu instead of officially appointed Guangzhou Zhifu. The statements made by YAN Ying and DA Ahong on the sinking of the British ship are not true.
出处 《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第6期123-129,共7页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
关键词 鸦片战争 懿律 定海之战 张朝发 琦善 《穿鼻草约》 余保纯 台湾人民抗英斗争 the Opium War George Elliot Dinghai Battles ZHANG Chao-fa QI Shah Convention of Chuenpeh YU Bao-chun Anti-British Struggles in Taiwan
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1牟安世.试析中国近代史的开始及其上限[J].学术月刊,1987,19(2):49-55. 被引量:3
  • 2姚廷芳.鸦片战争与道光皇帝·林则徐·琦善·耆英(上)[M].台北:三民书局,1970:221.
  • 3严中平.英国资产阶级纺织利益集团与两次鸦片战争史料(上)[J].经济研究,1955,1(1):64-72. 被引量:28
  • 4巴麦尊子爵致女王陛下驻华的两位全权大臣、尊敬的海军少将懿律和皇家海军上校义律函(第1号)[C]∥胡滨,译.英国档案有关鸦片战争资料选译(下册).北京:中华书局,1993:530-553.
  • 5义律海军上校致巴麦尊子爵函[C]∥胡滨,译.英国档案有关鸦片战争资料选译(下册).北京:中华书局,1993:664.
  • 6夏燮.中西纪事(卷二十四)[C]∥中国史学会.鸦片战争(四).上海:上海人民出版社,上海书店出版社,2000:653.
  • 7刘曾騄.和夷纪略[C]//中国史学会.鸦片战争(六).上海:上海人民出版社,上海书店出版社,2000:185.
  • 8浙江巡抚乌尔恭额奏报英军至定海递书并围城已亲自赶往筹防折[C]∥中国第一历史档案馆.鸦片战争档案史料Ⅱ.天津:天津古籍出版社.1992:154.
  • 9浙江巡抚乌尔恭额等奏为定海失守请将镇臣张朝发革职定罪并自请议处片[C]∥中国第一历史档案馆.鸦片战争档案史料Ⅱ.天津:天津古籍出版社,1992:161.
  • 10著伊里布抵浙后再行讯究已拟斩监候之张朝发接仗败退实情事上谕[c]∥中国第一历史档案馆.鸦片战争档案史料Ⅱ.天津:天津古籍出版社,1992:241.

二级参考文献12

  • 1《台湾镇总兵达洪阿等奏报生擒英兵并究出奸民通敌情形折》,《鸦片战争档案史料》第5册,第198页.
  • 2《著赏加达洪阿太子太保衔等并著开单保奏出力员弁事上谕》,《鸦片战争档案史料》第5册,第260页.
  • 3Capt. Denham's Mr. Roop's Joumals, The Chinese Repository, vol. 12, pp. 115-117; vol. 14, pp.299--304.
  • 4John. Ouchterlony, The Chinese War : An account of all the operations of the British forces from the commencement to the treaty of Nanking. London: Saunders and Otley, 1844, pp. 496-511.
  • 5W. D. Bernard, Narrative of the Voyages and Services of Nemesis from 1840 to 1843, And of the Combined Naval and Military Operation in China. London: Henry Colburn Puflisher, 1845, pp. 291-301.
  • 6D. Mcpherson, Tow Years in China: Narrative of the Chinese Expedition. London: Saunders and Otley, 1842, pp. 235-237.
  • 7E. C. Bridgman etc. (eds.), Shipping at Hongkong. The Chinese Repository, vol. 12, pp. 46-47.
  • 8Peter Ward Fay, The Opium War, 1840-1842. The University of North Caroline Press, 1975, pp.311-312.
  • 9List of the Rrew and Passengers of the Brig. The Chinese Repository, vol. 12, p. 114.
  • 10《台湾镇总兵官达洪阿等奏报(英船)又驶至鸡笼口滋扰已被击退情形折》,中国第一历史档案馆编.《鸦片战争档案史料》第4册,天津古籍出版,1992年,第295-297页.

共引文献33

同被引文献52

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部