期刊文献+

三种内固定方式治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效比较 被引量:16

A comparison of three operative treatments of distal femoral fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉及锁定加压钢板内固定治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效。方法 对2005年1月至2009年12月期间采用内固定治疗且获得随访的85例股骨远端骨折患者资料进行回顾性分析,男46例,女39例;年龄15-58岁,平均38.8岁。根据内固定方式不同分为3组:顺行髓内钉组(n=17)、逆行髓内钥。组(n=42)及锁定加压钢板组(n=26)。比较3组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、膝关节功能优良率及并发症发生率。结果85例患者术后获12-24个月(平均18个月)随访。陈1例患者出现骨折不愈合外,其余患者骨折均在6个月内获愈合。在于术时间和术中出血量方面,顺行髓内钉组、逆行髓内钉组均优于锁定加压钢板组,顺行髓内钉组优于逆行髓内钉组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。顺行髓内钉组、逆行髓内钉组及锁定加压钢板组患者膝关节Kolment标准评定结果优良率分别为58,8%(10/17)、88.1%(37/42)、69.2%(18/26),逆行髓内钉组与顺行髓内钉组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。顺行髓内钉组、逆行髓内钉组及锁定加压钢板组患者术后并发症发生率分别为11.8%(2/17)、9.5%(4/42)、7.7%(2/26),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。所有患者均未出现关节感染。结论 逆行髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折具有定位准确、固定牢靠、手术时间短及术中出血量少等优点,术后疗效较顺行髓内钉和锁定加压钢板更满意。 Objective To compare anterograde intramedullary nailing (AIN), retrograde in- tramedullary nailing (RIN) and loeking compression plating (I,CP) in tbe treatment of distal femoral fraetures. Methods The clinical data were reviewed of 85 patients with distal femoral fractures who had been treated in our department between January 2005 and December 2009. They were 46 males and 39 females, 15 to 58 years old (average, 38.8 years old) . According to the fixation they were divided into 3 groups: AIN ( n = 17), RIN (n = 42) and LCP (n = 26). They were compared in terms of operation time, bleeding volume, functional recovery of the knee and complications. Results They were followed tor 12 to 24 months (average, 18 months) . All patients obtained bone union within 6 months except one case of nonunion. In terms of operation time and bleeding volume, AIN aml RIN were significantly better than LCP, and A1N significantly better than RIN too ( P 〈 0.05). The good to excellent tale of functional recovery was 58.8% (10/17) for AIN, 88. 1% (37/42) for RIN and 69.2% (18/26) for LCP: RIN was signifieantly superior to AIN ( P 〈 0. 05). The rate of postoperative cmnplications was I 1.8% (2/1 7) for AIN , 9.5% (4/42) tor RIN and 7.7% (2/26) for LCP, with no signifieant belween-group difference( P = 1. 000) . Conclusion RIN has advantages of aecurate alignment, rigid immobilization, shorter operation time, less hleeding volume, and better funetional recovery of the knee over AIN anti LCP in the treatment of distal femoral fractures.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期950-953,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 股骨骨折 骨折围定术 骨钉 骨板 Femoral fractures Fracture fixation, internal Bone nails Bone plates
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1王宝军,刘振宇,赵亮,李亚东,刘长贵.三种内固定方法治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(12):1118-1121. 被引量:12
  • 2张文斌,李宏杰.闭合复位逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨髁上A型骨折[J].中国创伤骨科杂志,2001,3(3):181-182. 被引量:27
  • 3Mir HR, Jahangir AA, Sethi MK, et al. Grand rounds from Yander- bilt University: distal femoral fracture. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26: e60-e62.
  • 4刘竹林,刘牛庆,李玉民,袁义明.逆行交锁髓内钉与钢板治疗股骨中下段骨折临床疗效比较[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(5):1205-1206. 被引量:16
  • 5Jahangir AA, Cross WW, Schmidt AH. Current management of distal femoral fractures. Current Orthop Practice, 2010, 21: 193-197.
  • 6Henry SL, Trager S, Green S, et al. Management of supracondylar fractures of the femur with the GSH intramedullary nail: preliminary report. Contemp Orhop, 1991, 22: 631-640.
  • 7Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, et al. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i. m. ) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate. J Trauma, 2009, 66: 443-449.
  • 8Morgan S J, Agudelo JF. Retrograde femoral nailing for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Tech Knee Surg, 2005, 4: 248-256.

二级参考文献19

  • 1欧阳永生,苏伟.逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远段骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):1067-1068. 被引量:20
  • 2王兵,安智全,王烨明,曾炳芳.微创髓内钉插入技术治疗股骨干骨折的初步结果[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(2):115-118. 被引量:24
  • 3Kolmert L, Wulff K. Epideiology and treatment of distal femoral frac- tures in adults. Acta Orthop Stand, 1982, 53: 957-962.
  • 4Forster MC, Komarsamy B, Davison JN. Distal femoral fractures: a review of fixation methods. Injury, 2006, 37: 97-108.
  • 5Firoozbakhsh K, Behzadi K, Decoster TA. Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9: 152-157.
  • 6Koval K J, Kummer FJ, Bharam S, et al. Distal femoral fixation: a laboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate, antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10: 378-382.
  • 7Dunlop DG, Brenkel IJ. The supracondylar intramedullary nail in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. Injury, 1999, 30: 475-484.
  • 8Henry HL, Trager S, Green S, et al. Management of supracondylar fractures of the femur with the GSH intramedullary nail: preliminary report. Contemp Orthop, 1991, 22:631-640.
  • 9Schatzker J. Fractures of the distal femur revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, (347):43-56.
  • 10Leggon RE, Feldmann DD. Retrograde femoral nailing: a focus on the knee. Am J Knee Surg, 9001, 14: 109-115.

共引文献51

同被引文献140

引证文献16

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部