期刊文献+

选择性改良Sugiura手术治疗门静脉高压症出血24例分析 被引量:2

Selective modified sugiura operation in the treatment of 24 patients with bleeding portal hypertension
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹选择性改良Sugiura手术在治疗门静脉高压症伴出血中的应用价值。方法回顾2006年1月~2011年6月本院收治门静脉高压症患者24例,行选择性改良Sugiura手术的临床资料,其中急诊手术14例,相对择期止血后1~2周内手术10例。术中借助胃底大弯侧切口直视下结扎贲门周围曲张血管或剔除曲张静脉团,有利于防止术后再出血和胃黏膜病变。结果全组围术期无死亡病例、无再出血及肝性脑病发生。均获随访,随访时间6个月~6年,平均4年。于手术6个月后均行胃镜检查或食管钡餐检查提示食管胃底静脉曲张消失率90%,改善率10%。结论选择性改良Sugiura手术治疗门静脉高压症伴出血疗效令人满意,近远期止血效果确切、并发症少,是临床值得应用和推广的术式。 Objective To investigate the value of modified sugiura procedure in the treat- ment of portal hypertension with variceal bleeding. Methods Retrospective analysis of 24 patients with portal hypertension during January 2006 to June 2011 was conducted. All the patients were performed with modified sugiura procedure which included 14 patients with emergency surgery and 10 with elective surgery. Results The whole group had no perioperative deaths, further bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy. Disappearance of esophageal varices was 90 %, and improvement rate was 10 %. Conclusion The outcome of modified sugiura surgical in the treatment of portal hyper- tension with varieeal bleeding is satisfactory. It is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2012年第17期61-62,共2页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 门静脉高压症 食管胃底静脉曲张 吻合术 外科 portal hypertension esophageal and gastric varices anastomosis surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献77

  • 1谭毓铨,王贵民.门静脉高压症术后再出血问题[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(4):219-221. 被引量:17
  • 2张启瑜.门静脉高压症外科治疗进展[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2005,17(4):264-267. 被引量:11
  • 3[1]Warren WD,Zeppa R,Fomon JJ.Selective trans-splenic decompression of gastroesophageal varices by distal splenorenal shunt.Ann Surg 1967;166:437-455
  • 4[2]Henderson JM,Millikan WJ,Warren WD.The distal splenorenal shunt:an update.World J Surg 1984;8:722-732
  • 5[3]Spina GP,Galeotti F,Opocher E,Santambrogio R,Cucchiaro G,Lopez C,Pezzuoli G.Selective distal splenorenal shunt versus side-to-side portacaval shunt.Clinical results of a prospective,controlled study.Am J Surg 1988;155:564-571
  • 6[4]Spina G,Santambrogio R,Opocher E,Galeotti F,Cucchiaro G,Strinna M,Pezzuoli G.Improved quality of life after distal splenorenal shunt.A prospective comparison with side-to-side portacaval shunt.Ann Surg 1988;208:104-109
  • 7[5]Henderson JM,Kutner MH,Millikan WJ Jr,Galambos JT,Riepe SP,Brooks WS,Bryan FC,Warren WD.Endoscopic variceal sclerosis compared with distal splenorenal shunt to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.A prospective,randomized trial.Ann Intern Med 1990;112:262-269
  • 8[6]Rikkers LF,Jin G,Burnett DA,Buchi KN,Cormier RA.Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for variceal hemorrhage:late results of a randomized trial.Am J Surg 1993;165:27-32;discussion 32-33
  • 9[7]Terés J,Bordas JM,Bravo D,Visa J,Grande L,GarciaValdecasas JC,Pera C,Rodes J.Sclerotherapy vs.distal splenorenal shunt in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage:a randomized controlled trial.Hepatology 1987;7:430-436
  • 10[8]Spina GP,Santambrogio R,Opocher E,Cosentino F,Zambelli A,Passoni GR,Cucchiaro G,Macri M,Morandi E,Bruno S.Distal splenorenal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding.First stage of a randomized,controlled trial.Ann Surg 1990;211:178-186

共引文献31

同被引文献21

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部