期刊文献+

麻醉手术风险评估与麻醉分级 被引量:50

Risk assessment and anesthesia classification in anesthesia and operation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 围术期患者安全是麻醉和外科最重要的问题,也是影响外科治疗的关键因素。对患者做好准确而全面的术前评估和风险预测是做好术前准备、选择合适的麻醉和手术方式、做好对围术期并发症或特殊情况预防和处理的必要前提,也是降低围术期病死率、提高麻醉手术安全性的关键措施。本文对国内外术前评估和风险预测标准及应用进行了综合评述,并对一项新的麻醉分级标准进行探讨。 The safety of patient is the most important matter in anesthesia and operation.It is also a key factor to affect surgical treatment.The pre-operative evaluation and risk prediction are necessary preparations for surgery.To reduce the fatality rate in per-operative period and the anesthesia safety,it is necessary to choose appropriate anesthesia and surgery procedures and to well prepare for prevention of complications.In this paper,a new anesthesia classification is described.The standards of the pre-operative assessment and risk prediction are reviewed.
作者 蔡宏伟 曹娟
出处 《国际病理科学与临床杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期443-446,共4页 Journal of International Pathology and Clinical Medicine
关键词 围术期 风险评估 麻醉 手术 麻醉分级 peri-operation risk assessment anesthesia operation anesthesia classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures[J]. Anesthesiology, 1941,2(3):281-284.
  • 2American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status [J]. Anesthesiology, 1963,24(1): 111.
  • 3Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H.ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome[J]. BrJ Anesth, 1996, 77(2):217-222.
  • 4高强,窦倩慧,方超,向茜,唐林,汪晓东,李立.影响结肠癌患者术后并发症的多因素分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2011,18(2):159-163. 被引量:28
  • 5庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1086.
  • 6Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE : a severity of disease classification system[J]. Crit Care Med,1985, 13(10):818-829.
  • 7张维建,韩少良,蒋飞照,俞志勇,方瑶.APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分对结肠穿孔手术风险的评估[J].外科理论与实践,2008,13(3):197-200. 被引量:2
  • 8郑兴珍,朱简,于强.APACHE Ⅱ评分在临床应用的现状及进展[J].医学综述,2011,17(21):3297-3299. 被引量:71
  • 9Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit[J]. BrJ Surg, 1991, 78(3): 356-360.
  • 10Whiteley MS,Prytherch DR,Higgins B, et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system [J]. Br J Surly, 1996,83 (6):812-815.

二级参考文献27

  • 1吴鹏,孙翼,孙竞,李晓强.纤维蛋白原和D-二聚体在急性胰腺炎分型中的早期预测价值[J].郧阳医学院学报,2011,30(1):32-34. 被引量:7
  • 2陈兵,张璐.危重病患者血乳酸水平与APACHEⅡ评分相关性研究[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(1):63-63. 被引量:35
  • 3Armbruster C, Kriwanek S, Roka R. Spontaneous perforation of the large intestine. Resection with primary anastomosis or staged (Hartmann) procedure?[J]. Chirurg, 2001,72(8):910-913.
  • 4Bielecki K, Kaminski P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: morbidity and mortality [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2002,6(3): 177-182.
  • 5Biondo S, Pares D, Marti Rague J, et al. Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon [J]. Am J Surg,2002,183(3):256-260.
  • 6Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, et al. Presentation, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for obstructive and perforative colorectal carcinoma [J]. Am J Surg,2005,190(3):376-382.
  • 7Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation:a physiologically based classification system[J]. Crit Care Med, 1981,9(8):591-597.
  • 8Ochiai T, Hiranuma S, Takiguchi N, et al. SOFA score predicts postoperative outcome of patients with colorectal perforation[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2004,51 (58): 1007- 1010.
  • 9Oda S, Hirasawa H, Sugai T, et al. Comparison of Sepsisrelated Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and CIS (cellular injury score) for scoring of severity for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)[J]. Intensive Care Med,2000,26(12):1786-1793.
  • 10Komatsu S, Shimomatsuya T, Nakajima M, et al. Severity scoring systems for prognosis and efficacy of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber treatment for colonic perforation [J]. Surg Today, 2006,36(9):807-810.

共引文献121

同被引文献452

引证文献50

二级引证文献214

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部