期刊文献+

大学生自杀可能性的性别比较 被引量:3

Gender differences of the undergraduates' suicide probability
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨大学生自杀可能性的性别差异,为采取干预措施提供依据。方法整群抽取广东海洋大学一年级大学生6 794名,使用自杀可能性量表(SPS)进行测试。结果大学生自杀可能性在SPS条目、分量表和总量表得分上存在性别差异,有23个条目上的得分性别差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。除敌意量表外,其余3个分量表和总量表的得分均为男生高于女生(P值均<0.05)。大学生自杀可能性的检出率也存在性别差异,男生SPS总分60分以上的比例高于女生,而60分以下的比例为女生高于男生;70分以上的检出率为19.7%,男生(20.6%)高于女生(18.0%)。结论大学生自杀可能性存在性别差异,男生高于女生。 Objective To explore the gender differences of the college students' suicide probability.Methods By means of cluster sampling method,a total of 6 794 undergraduates were tested with the Suicide Probability Scale(SPS).Results There are significantly gender differences on SPS items,sub-scales and total scale: the score on some items was higher in boys than girls and some girls higher than boys(P0.05);in addition to the Hostility Scale,the remaining three subscale and the total scale scores were higher in boys than girls(P0.05).There were also gender differences between the detection rates of college students' suicide probability: the detection rates of boys were higher than girls in the group of 60 points or more,but lower than girls in the group of less than 60 points;the detection rate in the group of 70 points or more was 19.7%,boys'(20.6%) was higher than that of girls(18.0%).Conclusion The gender differences of the college students' suicide probability is significant,boys' is higher than that of girls.
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第10期1198-1200,共3页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(09YJCXLX003)
关键词 自杀 性别特征 精神卫生 学生 Suicide Gender indetity Mental health Students
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1黄润龙.近21年我国自杀人口的性别差异[J].西北人口,2011,32(1):59-63. 被引量:7
  • 2肖水源,王小平,徐慧兰.我国现阶段自杀研究及预防工作中的几个问题[J].中华精神科杂志,2003,36(3):129-131. 被引量:39
  • 3PHILLIPS MR, LI X, ZHANG Y. Suicide rates in China,1995-1999[J]. Lancet, 2002,359(3) :835-840.
  • 4ZHANG J,JIANG C, JIA SH,et al. An overview of suicide researchin China[J]. Arch Suic Res, 2002,6(2) :167-184.
  • 5TATMAN SM, GREENE AL, KARR LC. Use of the suicide proba-bility scale (SPS) with adolescents[ J]. Suic LTH B, 1993,23(3):188-203.
  • 6BAGGE C,OSMAN A. The suicide probability scale: Norms andfactor structure[ J]. Psychol R, 1998,83(2) :637-63B.
  • 7NAUD H,DAIGLE MS. Predictive validity of the suicide probabilityscale in a male inmate population[ J] . J Psychopath B Ass, 2010,32(3):333-342.
  • 8VALADEZ A, GRANELLO PF,JUHNKE GA, et al. The suicideprobability scale: A means to assess substance abusing clients' sui-cide risk[ J]. J Profes Counsel PR, 2009,37( 1 ) :51-65.
  • 9ELTZ M, EVANS AS, CELIO M, et el. Suicide probability scale andits utility with adolescent psychiatric patients [ J]. Child Psych,2007,38(1) :17-29.
  • 10LARZELERE RE, SMITH GL,BATENHORST LM,et el. Predictivevalidity of the suicide probability scale among adolescents in grouphome treatment [ J]. J AM Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1996,35(2):166-172.

二级参考文献81

共引文献166

同被引文献60

  • 1张海钟,张小龙.高校学生性别比例问题综述[J].理工高教研究,2009,28(1):16-18. 被引量:15
  • 2江光荣,夏勉.心理求助行为:研究现状及阶段-决策模型[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(6):888-894. 被引量:100
  • 3Ray LY, Johnson N. Adolescent suicide [ J ]. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1983,62 (3) : 131 - 5.
  • 4Fu KW,Cheng Q,Wong PW,et al. Responses to a self-presented suicide attempt in social media: a social network analysis [ J ].Crisis : The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 2013,34(6) :406.
  • 5Cheng Q, Chang SS, Yip PS. Opportunities and challenges of on- line data collection for suicide prevention [ J ]. The Lancet ,2012, 379(9830) :e53 - e54.
  • 6Silenzio V,Duberstein PR, Tang W,et al. Connecting the invisi- ble dots: reaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents and young adults at risk for suicide through online social networks [ J ]. Social Science and Medicine,2009,69(3) :469 -474.
  • 7Jashinsky J, Burton SH, Hanson CL, et al. Tracking suicide risk factors through Twitter in the US [ J ]. Crisis:The Journal of Cri- sis Intervention and Suicide Prevention ,2013,35 (1) :51 -59.
  • 8Cull JG, Gill WS. Suicide probability scale [ M ]. Los Angeles, CA :Western Psychological Services, 1982.
  • 9Valadez A, Juhnke GA, Coil KM, et al. The Suicide Probability Scale: a means to assess substance abusing clients' suicide risk [ J ]. Journal of Professional Counseling : Practice, Theory, and Research 2009, 37(1 ) .51 -65.
  • 10Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. Psychological as- pects of natural language use : our words, ourselves [ J ]. Annual Review of Psychology,2003,54 ( 1 ) :547 - 577.

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部