期刊文献+

SLIPA喉罩通气用于前列腺电切术对循环的影响 被引量:1

Effect of ventilaton with SLIPA airway mask on circulation in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨SLIPA喉罩在前列腺电切术中的应用价值。方法 100例前列腺电切术患者随机均分为SLIPA喉罩组(S组)和气管插管组(T组)。记录麻醉诱导前(T0)、置入喉罩或气管导管即刻(T1)、置入喉罩或气管导管后3min(T2)、拔除喉罩或气管导管前(T3)及拔除喉罩/气管导管时(T4)的BP及HR。记录术后不良反应发生率。结果与T0比较,T组T2及T5时,SBP、DBP显著升高,HR明显增快(P<0.05);S组各时间点SBP、DBP、HR变化不明显。T2及T5时,S组BP低于T组,HR慢于T组(P<0.05)。S组拔除喉罩时的呛咳和术后咽喉疼痛的发生率低于T组(P<0.05)。结论与常规气管插管比较,SLIPA喉罩用于前列腺电切术麻醉,操作方便,对循环影响小。 Objective To observe the effect of ventilaton with SLIPA laryngeal mask airway on circulation in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate(TURP). Methods A total of 100 patients undergoing TURP under general anesthesia was equally divided into two groups of S (ventilated with SLIPA) and T(ventilated with tracheal intubation under laryngoscopy). BP and HR were recorded before(T0) and during inserting SLIPA or induction(T1), at 3 rain(T2) after insertion, before(T3) and during(T4) withdrawal of SLIPA or intubation. Adverse responses were recorded. Results BP and HR of group T at T2 and T5 were higher than those at TO and group S(P〈0. 05). The incidence rates of choke and throat ache in group S were lower than those in group T(P〈0. 05). Conclusion Compared to conventional intubation, ventilation with SIAPA laryngeal mask airway has less effect on circulation and with less adverse effects.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第21期2567-2569,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 喉罩 气管插管 前列腺电切术 Laryngeal mask airway Tracheal intubation Transurethral resection of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1曹灵敏,李胜德,马桂芬,景卫.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(12):742-742. 被引量:236
  • 2董补怀,张彦声,代畔,孙晓娟.腰-硬联合麻醉用于老年人髋关节置换术100例[J].陕西医学杂志,2006,35(2):217-220. 被引量:7
  • 3井郁陌,王香梅,刘莉,兰基山,孙国明,黄明.腰-硬联合麻醉用于高龄高危患者下肢手术的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(6):504-505. 被引量:72
  • 4Finucane BT,Santora AH. The Laryngeal Mask Airway. In: Finucane BT, Santora AH. Principle of Airway Management. 3rd edn. New York : Springer-Verlag. 2003, 438-490.
  • 5Asai T, Editorial II. Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth, 2004, 93: 497-500.
  • 6Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19 : 641-659.
  • 7Laffon M, Fcrrandicrc M, Mercier C, et al. Transient lingual and glossopharyngeal nerve injury: a complication of cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesthesiology, 2001, 94: 719-720.
  • 8Brimaeombe J, Clarke G, Keller C. Lingual nerve injury associated with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway : a case report and review of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2005, 95 : 420-423.
  • 9Lowinger D, Benjamin B, Gadd L. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury caused by a laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care, 1999, 27 :202-205.
  • 10Akhatar TM,Street MK. Risk of aspiration with the laryngeal mask. Br J Anaesth, 1994, 72: 447-450.

共引文献46

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部