期刊文献+

不同麻醉方式下胆囊切除术后呕吐与动脉血气变化的对比观察

Comparative observation the vomiting and arterial blood gas changes by the cholecystectomy surgery with different anesthetic techniques
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同麻醉方式下胆囊切除术后呕吐与动脉血气变化的对比情况。方法:采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者90例按就诊顺序编号分为两组-治疗组与对照组各45例,对照组麻醉维持用恩氟烷与瑞芬太尼麻醉,治疗组用丙泊酚靶控输注加瑞芬太尼维持麻醉。结果:治疗组与对照组相比,患者术后清醒时间与拔管时间比较小(P<0.05)。两组在解除气腹后5mi n动脉血气各指标对比都无明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗组呕吐发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05),同时严重程度也低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:丙泊酚输注加瑞芬太尼可较好控制对呕吐与动脉血气的影响,同时缩短清醒时间与拔管时间,可达到平衡麻醉的要求。 Objective To investigate the comparative effects of the vomiting and arterial blood gas changes by the cholecystectomy surgery with different anesthetic techniques. Methods 90 cases with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were equally divided into two groups accorded to treatment sequence number - the treatment group and control group, the control group used the enflurane and remifentanil anesthesia were maintained, and the treatment group used the propofol and remifentanil anesthesia were maintained. Results The awake and extubation time of the treatment group were shorter than the control group (P〈0.05). The arterial blood gas index between the two groups had no significant difference (P〉0.05). The incidence of vomiting of the treatment group was significantly lower than the control group (P〈0.05), and the severity was lower than the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion TIVA with propofol and remifentanil anesthesia in the application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can better control the vomiting and arterial blood gas, and shorten the awake time and time that can be achieved by the requirements of balanced anesthesia.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2012年第09X期81-82,共2页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 胆囊切除术 麻醉 呕吐 动脉血气 cholecystectomy surgery anesthesia vomiting arterial blood gas
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献26

  • 1韩文斌,宋运琴.MAC的临床研究进展[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1996,17(5):303-307. 被引量:6
  • 2[3]Mertens MJ,Olofsen E,Engbers FH,et al.Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergistic manner:response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-propofol interactions[J].Anesthesiology,2003,99(8):347 ~59.
  • 3[4]Juckenhofel S,Feisel C,Schmitt HJ,et al.TIVA with propofol-remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentany1 in laparoscopic operations.Hemodynamics,awakening and adverse effects[J].Anaesthesist,1999,48(11):807 ~ 812.
  • 4Berthoud MC,Reilly CS. Adverse effects of general anaesthetics[J ]. Drug Saf,1992,7(6):434-459.
  • 5Glass PA,Shafer SL,Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery systems[A ]. In:Miller RD,eds. Anesthesia[M]. 5th ed.Harcount Asia:Churchill Livingston e,2001.377-411.
  • 6Nieuwenhuyzen MC,Engbers FH,Vuyk J,et al. Target-controlled inf usion sys tems:role in anaesthesia and analgesia[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet,2000,38(2):181-1 90.
  • 7Naganobu K,Hagio M. Dose-related cardiovascular effects of isoflu rane in children during controlled ventilation[J]. Med Sci,2000,62(4):435-437.
  • 8Torri G,Casati A. Cardiovascular hemostasis during inhalation a nesthesia: a clinical comparison between sevoflurane and isoflurane. On behalf o f Italian research group on sevoflurane[J]. J Clin Anesth,2000,12(2):117-122.
  • 9Kraaier V,Van Huffelen AC,Wieneke GH.Changes in quantitative EEG and blood flow velocity due to standardized hyperventilation:a model of transient ischaemia in young human subjects.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophsiol,1988,70:377-387.
  • 10Schubert A,Drummond JC.The effect of acute hypocapnia on human median nerve somatosensory evoked responses.Anesth Analg,1986,65:240-244.

共引文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部