摘要
《统一欺诈转让法》具有创新性的制度架构,先进的立法思想与良好的制度价值,而我国相关的立法规制与之相比则存在明显缺失,同时我国债权人面临着公司欺诈转让行为的现实挑战,因此,我们应借鉴《统一欺诈转让法》(UFTA),制定专门性《反公司欺诈财产转让条例》以应对公司欺诈转让行为。
Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act （UFTA） has innovative system architecture, advanced legislative ideas and good system value. Compared with the Act, the relevant legislation systems in China are obviously imperfect. At the same time, Chinese creditors face the practical challenges of the company＇s fraudulent transfer. Therefore, we should learn from the Unified Fraudulent Transfer Act, develop ＂ anti-corporate fraudulent transfer of property regulations＂ to deal with the fraudulent transfer.
出处
《石家庄经济学院学报》
2012年第5期120-127,共8页
Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
基金
中国政法大学博士创新基金资助项目(2011bscx15)
关键词
统一欺诈转让法
欺诈转让
债权人
借鉴
Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
fraudulent transfer
creditor
learn from
