摘要
目的比较厄洛替尼在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)二线和三线治疗的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析145例ⅢB期和Ⅳ期接受二线或三线厄洛替尼治疗的NSCLC患者,其中84例患者接受厄洛替尼二线治疗,61例患者接受厄洛替尼三线治疗。应用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。结果厄洛替尼二三线治疗客观缓解率(ORR)分别为15.5%和13.1%(P=0.690),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为61.9%和60.7%(P=0.879),中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为4.000个月和3.330个月(P=0.334),中位总生存期(OS)分别为21.770个月和25.830个月(P=0.461)。两组不良反应近似。结论厄洛替尼用于晚期NSCLC二线治疗或三线治疗,两者疗效相当。大部分患者能够耐受其不良反应。
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of erlotinib as second line and third line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung caneer (NSCLC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 145 cases advanced NSCLC patients in our hospital. 84 cases were given erlotinib as second line therapy and 61 cases were given erlotinib as third line therapy.Survival analysis was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier method. Results The erlotinib as second-line therapy group was similar to the third-line therapy group in objective response rate (ORR)(15.5% vs 13.1% ,P = 0.690),the disease control rate (DCR)(61.9% vs 60.7% ,P = 0.879),the median progression free survival (PFS)(4.000 months vs 3.330 months,P = 0.334),and the median overall survival (OS)(21.770 months vs 25.830 months,P = 0.46l). The toxicities in these two groups have not significantly difference. Conclusion There is no significantly difference of response rate or survival benefit between second line and third line therapies with erlotinib in advanced NSCLC. The toxicities could be acceptable in most of the patients.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2012年第29期52-54,57,共4页
China Modern Doctor
基金
浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金(2010KYA032
2010KYA036)
吴阶平医学基金(320.6750.11059)
关键词
非小细胞肺癌
厄洛替尼
生存分析
Non-small cell lung cancer
Erlotinib
Survival analysis