期刊文献+

不同气井生产动态分析方法对比分析研究 被引量:7

COMPARISON OF PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR DIFFERENT GAS WELLS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 气井生产动态特征分析是气田开发过程中重要的基础工作。长期以来,动态分析方法在油气田产量预测、可采储量计算、地层参数的确定中得到广泛应用。为此,在调研大量国内外文献的基础上,系统介绍了传统的Arps、Fetkovich方法和现代的Blasingame曲线、Agarwal-Gardner(A-G)、规整化压力积分(NPI)方法的基本原理及适用条件,进一步对比了不同气井生产动态分析方法的优缺点。把握不同动态分析方法的原理及其优缺点,为气藏工作者选择合适的动态分析方法提供了依据。 Production performance analysis is an important foundation in gasfield development.For a long time,performance analysis methods have been applied widely to yield prediction,recoverable reserves calculation and formation parameters determination.This paper presents the basic principles and applicable conditions of two conventional methods named Arps and Fetkvoich,and other three modern methods including Blasingame Curve,Agarwal-Gardner(A-G) and Normalization Pressure Integration(NPI).Furthermore,the advantages and disadvantages of those methods used for different gas wells are compared.Their own principles,and advantages and disadvantages can be very helpful in selecting the suitable one for effective development.
机构地区 西南石油大学
出处 《天然气勘探与开发》 2012年第4期56-59,10-11,共4页 Natural Gas Exploration and Development
关键词 动态分析 Arps方法 Fetkovich方法 Blasingame方法 A—G方法 NPI方法 performance analysis,Arps method,Fetkvoich method,Blasingame method,A-G method,NPI method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Fetkovich M J. Decline Curve Analysis using TypeCurves [ C]. SPE 4629, Presented at the SPE 48th FallMeeting,held in LasVegas, 1973.
  • 2Blasingame T A, McCray T L, Lee W J. Decline Curve Analysis for Variable Pressure Drop/Variable Flowate Systems[ C]. SPE 21513, Presented at the SPE GasTechnology Sym-posium held inHousion, Texas, 1991.
  • 3S. MOGHADAM, O JEJE. Advanced Gas Material Balance, in Simplified Format;CIPC, June 2009 16-18.

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部