期刊文献+

A dosimetric comparative study between conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of primary nasopharyngeal carcinomas: the Egyptian experience

三维适形放疗和调强放疗治疗原发性鼻咽癌的剂量学对比研究:来自埃及的经验报道(英文)
暂未订购
导出
摘要 Objective: The study is a comparative study, the aim of which is to compare 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in treating nasopharyngeal carcinomas; dosimetrically evaluating and comparing both techniques as regard target coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR). Methods: Twenty patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated by 3D-CRT technique and another 20 patients were treated by IMRT. A dosimetric comparison was done by performing two plans for the same patient using Eclipse planning system (version 8.6). Results: IMRT had a better tumor coverage and conformity index compared to 3D-CRT plans (P value of 0.001 and 0.004), respectively. As for the dose homogeneity it was also better in the IMRT plans and the reason for this was attributed to the dose inhomogeneity at the photon/electron junction in the 3D-CRT plans (P value 0.032). Also, doses received by the risk structures, particularly parotids, was significantly less in the IMRT plans than those of 3D-CRT (P value 0.001). Conclusion: IMRT technique was clearly able to increase the dose delivery to the target volume, improve conformity and homogeneity index and spare the parotid glands in comparison to 3D-CRT technique.
出处 《The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CAS 2012年第11期626-631,共6页 中德临床肿瘤学杂志(英文版)
关键词 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) nasopharyngeal carcinoma XEROSTOMIA 放射治疗 鼻咽癌 剂量 CRT技术 Eclipse 埃及 不均匀性 均匀度指数
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Hoppe RT, Goffinet DR, Bagshaw MA. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Eighteen years’ experience with megavoltage radiation therapy. Cancer, 1976, 37:2605-2612.
  • 2Vikram B, Mishra UB, Strong EW, et al. Patterns of failure in carcinoma of the nasopharynx: I. Failure at the primary site. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1985,11:1455-1459.
  • 3Perez CA, Devineni VR, Marcial-Vega V, et al. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx: factors affecting prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1992, 23: 271-280.
  • 4Sanguineti G, Geara FB, Garden AS, et al. Carcinoma of the naso pharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 37:985-996.
  • 5Lee AW, Law SC, Foo W, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: local control by megavoltage irradiation. Br J Radiol, 1993,66: 528-536.
  • 6Hunt MA, Zelefsky MJ, Wolden S, ef al. Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001,49:623-632.
  • 7Huchet A, Caudry M, Belkacemi Y, et al. Volume-effect and radiotherapy. Part II: volume-effect and normal tissue. Cancer Radiother, 2003, 7: 353-362.
  • 8Goitein M, Abrams M, Rowell D, et al. Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1983,9: 789-797.
  • 9Pirzkall A, Carol M, Lohr F, ef al. Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy with conventional conformal radiotherapy for complex shaped tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,48:1371-1380.
  • 10Lee N, Xia P, Fischbein NJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: The UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57: 49-60.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部