期刊文献+

上前牙区单个种植牙牙龈生物学类型对龈乳头重建的影响 被引量:14

Papilla alteration in different gingival biotypes at single implant-supported restoration in anterior maxilla
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察上颌前牙区单个种植牙近远中龈乳头高度变化,并分析不同牙龈生物学类型对龈乳头重建的影响。方法:选择30例上前牙区单牙缺失患者,分别植入Straumann软组织水平种植体。所有患者在3个月后取模时,用直接测量方法测量种植体唇侧黏膜厚度,将其分为A组(黏膜厚度≥1.5 mm,16例)、B组(黏膜厚度<1.5 mm,14例)2组。在修复体戴入时(基线期)和6个月后(随访期)观察近、远中龈乳头充盈度,并测量龈乳头高度及龈乳头-冠接触点的距离。采用SPSS19.0软件包分析6个月后近、远中龈乳头高度的变化,比较龈乳头高度在A、B 2组间的差异。结果:所有种植体的留存率为100%。60个龈乳头的平均高度在基线期和随访期分别为(1.64±0.97)mm和(3.10±1.39)mm,平均增加(1.46±0.75)mm,具有显著差异(P<0.05)。在A组,近、远中龈乳头-冠接触点的平均距离分别为(0.15±0.24)mm和(0.23±0.33)mm,充盈度则为(97±5)%和(94±8)%;而在B组,近、远中龈乳头-冠接触点的平均距离分别为(1.94±0.40)mm和(2.10±0.34)mm,充盈度则为(53±9)%和(43±14)%。A、B两组间有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:上颌前牙区单个种植牙修复后6个月,两侧的龈乳头高度可随着时间产生不同程度的增加,而龈乳头的增加则受不同的牙龈生物学类型的影响。其中,厚龈生物型比薄龈生物型在龈乳头重建方面有着更好的再生潜力。 PURPOSE: To observe the alteration of the interproximal papilla height after single implant restoration in the anterior maxilla and to assess the influence of gingival biotypes on papilla regeneration.METHODS: Thirty patients with single-tooth implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla were assigned to two groups according to labial mucosa thickness.Group A: labial mucosal thickness≥1.5 mm and group B: labial mucosal thickness1.5 mm.The presence of interproximal papilla as well as the distance between papilla apex and contact point were assessed at crown attachment(baseline) and after 6 months(follow-up).Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19.0 software package.RESULTS: The 6-month survival rate of implants was 100%.The mean height of interproximal papilla at baseline and follow-up was(1.64 ±0.97) mm and(3.10 ±1.39) mm,respectively.A significant improvement in papilla height was found between baseline and follow-up(P0.05).In group A,the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was(0.15±0.24) mm and(0.23±0.33) mm,respectively,and the presence of interproximal papilla were(97±5)% and(94 ±8)%,respectively.In group B,the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was(1.94±0.40) mm and(2.10±0.34) mm,respectively,and the presence of interproximal papilla was(53±9)% and(43±14)% respectively.Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups(P0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The interproximal papilla height around single implant restorations could improve significantly after 6-month follow-up. The interproximal papilla height around single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla was influenced by gingival biotype. The regenerative potential of thick-gingival biotype was better than that of thin-gingival biotype.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期541-545,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(31070842) 上海市科学技术委员会资助项目(09411955000 1052nm04500)~~
关键词 龈乳头高度 接触点 牙龈生物学类型 Interproximal papilla height Contact point Gingival biotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1989,62(5): 567-572.
  • 2Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, et al. Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a controlled clinical trial [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofae Implants, 2005,20(5): 753-761.
  • 3Chang LC, The association between embrasure morphology and central papilla recession[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007,34(5): 432- 436.
  • 4Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, et al. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans[J]. J Periodontol, 2003,74(4): 557-562.
  • 5Oates TW, West J, Jones J, et al. Long-term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implants [J]. Implant Dent, 2002,11(3): 272-279.
  • 6Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1997,17(4): 326-333.
  • 7Chu SJ, Tarnow DP, Tan JH, et al. Papilla proportions in the maxillary anterior dentition [J], Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009,29(4): 385-393.
  • 8Zetu L, Wang HL, Management of inter-dental/inter-implant papilla[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005,32(7): 831-839.
  • 9Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, et al. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology [J]. J Periodontol, 2010,81(4): 569-574.
  • 10Chow YC, Eber RM, Tsao YP, et al. Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010,37(8): 719-727.

同被引文献110

  • 1王永林.前牙缺失临时修复的治疗体会[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(25):3382-3383. 被引量:4
  • 2郭吕华,魏娟,康博,林丽娥.即刻种植早期效果观察[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2009,14(2):58-59. 被引量:2
  • 3吴展,李婧,陈卓凡.上颌前牙即刻种植即刻修复的临床应用研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2012,17(2):67-71. 被引量:41
  • 4陈琰,刘洪臣,张磊,金真,刘刚,张庆诗.人脑对牙髓冷刺激痛反应的功能性磁共振成像研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(1):99-102. 被引量:5
  • 5Kois JC. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diag- nostic keys[ J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2004,25 (11 ) :895- 896, 898, 900, 906-907.
  • 6Ferrus J, Ceeehinato D, Pjetursson EB, et al. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extrac- tion sockets[ J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010,21 (1) :22-29.
  • 7Waasdorp JA, Evian CI, Mandracchia M. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature [J]. J Periodontol, 2010,81(6) :801-808.
  • 8Bhola M, Neely AL, Kolhatkar S. Immediate implant placement: clinical decisions, advantages, and disadvantages [ J ]. J Prosth- odont, 2008,17 (7) :576-581.
  • 9Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, et al. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology[J]. J Periodontal, 2010,81 (4) : 569-574.
  • 10Chow YC, Eber RM, Tsao YP, et al. Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae[ J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010,37 (8) :719-727.

引证文献14

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部