摘要
目的:比较听觉稳态反应(ASSR)与听性脑干反应(ABR)的差异,探讨ASSR作为新生儿听力筛查后续诊断的可靠性。方法:对246例(492耳)婴幼儿分别行ASSR和ABR测试,比较两者的引出率及ABR测试正常耳与ASSR反应阈值的差异。结果:492耳中有387耳可引出ABR,263耳ABR反应阈在正常范围,481耳可引出ASSR。在ABR正常范围的263耳,ASSR除0.5kHz外,其余频率阈值与ABR阈值无显著差异性。结论:ASSR具有频率特性和高强度的优点,其高频反应阈与ABR阈值无显著差异性。
Objective：To compare the differences of auditory steady-state response（ASSR） and auditory brainstem response（ABR）,explore the reliability of ASSR as a method for subsequent diagnosis after neonatal hearing screening. Methods：A total of 246 infants（492 ears） received ASSR test and ABR test;the extraction rates and the response thresholds of ABR and ASSR were compared. Results：Among 492 ears,387 ears showed ABR response and 481 ears showed ASSR response,the response thresholds of ABR in 263 ears were within normal range.Among 263 ears within normal range of ABR,except 0.5 kHz,there was no statistically significant difference in the response thresholds of the other frequencies between ABR test and ASSR test. Conclusion：ASSR has the advantages of frequency characteristics and high intensity,there was no statistically significant difference in the high frequency response thresholds between ASSR and ABR.
出处
《中国妇幼保健》
CAS
北大核心
2012年第30期4721-4723,共3页
Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金
镇江市2007年度社会发展指导性科技计划项目〔FZ2007065〕
江苏大学2008年度临床医学科技〔JLY20080063〕
关键词
听觉稳态反应
听性脑干反应
反应阈
婴幼儿
Auditory steady-state response
Auditory brainstem response
Auditory threshold
Infant
