摘要
法理学研究与司法实践是建构法治国家的两个紧密关联的重要方面。当前中国法理学研究中存在宏大叙事和文本主义的倾向,在司法实践中则有死守"法律形式主义"的可能,两者因与现实脱节而构成目前中国法理学研究的困境,而引致这种困境的则是占据主导的传统"立法者的法理学"。通过超越传统司法推理模式,转换"立法者"的姿态,而以法律现实主义的立场与方法,确立一种通往司法的法理学,或可摆脱前述困境。
The jurisprudence study and judicial practice constitute two interrelated aspects in constructing the rule of law.The present research on jurisprudence has the tendency of grand narrative and textualism;while in judicial practice,the ＂legal formalism＂ has been rigidly followed.These two phenomena have deviated from reality thus causing predicament for jurisprudence study in China.The predominantly traditional ＂legislators＇ jurisprudence＂ should account for such predicament.It is suggested to overcome the traditional judicial reasoning mode,to transform the position of ＂legislators＂ and to adopt a stance and method of legal realism,so as to establish a judicial path for jurisprudence,which can probably shake off the predicament.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2012年第5期15-25,共11页
Northern Legal Science
基金
2011年北京市优秀人才培养资助项目"中国司法的现实主义转型研究"(项目编号2011D009002000002)
北京航空航天大学"985"项目"蓝天新星"专项资助的支持
且为以上项目的阶段性研究成果
关键词
传统法学
立法者
现实主义
司法的法理学
traditional jurisprudence
legislators
realism
judicial oriented jurisprudence
