摘要
环境的公共物品属性导致了环境公益代表主体在我国民事诉讼制度上的缺位,由检察机关出任环境公益的代表提起民事诉讼,是我国现阶段的必然选择。其外因在于有关主体担此重任的能力缺失,具体表现为个体环保法律意识不足、环保团体发展滞后、环保行政监管部门自身缺陷;其内因在于检察机关自身的法律地位、角色性质、基本职能决定了它主导环境民事公益诉讼的适当性。
Environment is a kind of public goods. However, the representative vacancy of public environment interest is the fact in the system of Chinese civil litigation. The procuratorial organ plays the role of plaintiff for the public environment interest in the civil litigation, which is an inevitable choice for now in China. The external cause is that some subjects can＇t undertake the important task, because of their ability vacancy. They are individual, environmental non-government organization and environmental supervision department. The internal cause is the appropriateness for procuratorial organ to act the plaintiff in the public environment litigation. They are legal status, procuratorial power and basic function.
出处
《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第6期22-27,共6页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金
2011年山东省人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题"环境公益诉讼之检察机关主导模式研究"阶段成果
关键词
检察机关
环境公益诉讼
民事诉讼
主导模式
procuratorial organ
environment public interest litigation
civil litigation
dominant mode
