摘要
关于世界贸易组织以及欧洲联盟"宪政"的关注度日见高涨,其中,不乏将"司法造法"视为世贸组织制度"宪法化""引擎"的"司法宪法化"学说。但在政府间国际组织内谈论"宪政",不得不保持审慎的态度。比较世界贸易组织上诉机构澄清规则、填补规则、引入规则的司法能动,与欧洲法院的实践有本质的不同,其能动性的发挥有显著的特殊性,不得不区别对待、具体分析。
The rising concerns on the constitutional issues of the WTO and the EU have attracted the most public attention.These issues include some theories regarding ＂judicial law-making＂ as the ＂engine＂ of the WTO system to stimulate its ＂constitutionalization＂.Nevertheless,a cautious attitude shall be taken when we discuss the issues of ＂constitutionalism＂ under the context of international inter-governmental organizations.Compared with the practice of the European Court,the ＂judicial activism＂ of the WTO Appellate Body to clarify,fill and incorporate its rules,is substantially different.The notable distinctions therein need to be seen into and to be given specific analysis.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2012年第5期44-49,共6页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
司法宪法化
司法能动
宪政
世界贸易组织上诉机构
欧洲法院
judicial constitutionalization
judicial activism
constitutionalism
the WTO appellate body
the European Court
