期刊文献+

测试阶段启动导致的错误记忆

Priming on Testing Phase Cause False Memory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究采用DRM范式探讨测试阶段启动导致的错误记忆现象。实验一采用传统"测试诱导启发程序"探讨关键诱饵前词数以及关键诱饵前词是否启动关键诱饵对错误再认的影响。实验二改进传统"测试诱导启发程序"排除反应定势影响下进一步考察实验一两自变量对关键诱饵错误再认的影响。结果表明:(1)测试阶段的启动确实对错误记忆有影响,关键诱饵前呈现6个词比呈现3个词引发更多的错误记忆,但是比起学习阶段的语义联想激活测试阶段的语义启动效应很微弱,关键诱饵前呈现启动词与非启动词对错误记忆影响不显著。(2)在排除反应定势后的不确定条件下,"赌徒谬误"心理对被试判断起一定作用。 Using DRM paradigm discussed a result of the testing phase activation of semantic associations generated by the phenomenon of false memory.Experiment 1 using traditional "Test-induced priming procedure"to investigate an effect which affect false memory made by the number and the properties of words before critical lure.Experiment 2 improve the tradition procedure to get rid of response set to investigate the effect.The results show:(1)The semantic priming on testing phase plays a role on production of false memory,6 words before critical lure cause more false memories than 3 words.But comparing with an effect on learning phase the semantic priming on testing phase is very weak and there is no significant difference between priming words and non-priming words before critical lure.(2)After the exclusion of the response set of uncertainty,"Gambler's fallacy"psychological judgments of the subjects play a role.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2012年第3期215-219,共5页 Psychological Exploration
基金 西南大学国家重点学科"基础心理学"项目(NSKD08002)
关键词 DRM范式 错误记忆 测试启动 DRM paradigm false memory test-induced priming
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1杜秀敏,张庆林,曾建敏,崔茜,罗俊龙,阮小林.热手谬误?赌徒谬误?——随机序列知觉中近因效应的格式塔现象研究[J].心理学报,2008,40(8):853-861. 被引量:3
  • 2Arndt, J. , & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language,48( 1 ) ,1 - 15.
  • 3Coane,J. H. , & McBride, D. M. (2006). The role of test structure in creating false memories. Memory & Cognition ,34 (5) , 1026 - 1036.
  • 4Deese,J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology,58( 1 ), 17.
  • 5Dewhurst, S. A. , Bould, E. , Knott, L. M. , & Thorley, C. (2009). The roles of encoding and retrieval processes in associative and categorical memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language ,60( 1 ) , 154 - 164.
  • 6Jarvik, M. E. (1951 ). Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of ahemative symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology,41 (4), 291.
  • 7Marsh, E. J. , & Dolan, P. O. ( 2007 ). Test - induced priming of false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14 ( 3 ), 479 - 483.
  • 8McCabe,D. P. , Presmanes, A. G. , Robertson, C. L. , & Smith, A. D. (2004). Item - specific processing reduces false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 (6), 1074 - 1079.
  • 9McDermott, K. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall. Journal of Memory and Language ,35 ( 2 ) ,212 - 230.
  • 10Roediger, H. L. , & McDermott, K. B. ( 1995 ). Creating false memories:Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (4), 803.

二级参考文献4

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部