期刊文献+

Effects of backrest density on lumbar load and comfort during seated work 被引量:1

Effects of backrest density on lumbar load and comfort during seated work
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Seated workplaces have greatly increased in China. Many researchers have found that seated work is a risk factor in the development of low-back pain. Backrest can reduce the load on the lower back by transmitting more of the weight from the upper body to the floor via the backrest so as to prevent low-back pain. To design a suitable chair backrest for seated office work, some backrest parameters must be optimized. In this study, the role of backrest density on lumbar load and comfort were investigated. The goal of the study was to help establish criteria with which backrests that alleviate and prevent low back pain during seated office work can be designed and selected. Methods Twenty volunteers (10 men and 10 women) were seated in three backrest conditions (10 kg/m^3, 25 kg/m^3, and 40 kg/m^3). Pressure data, including contact pressure (CP), peak contact pressure (PCP) and contact area were collected during 15-minute trial. Subjective data were collected after each pressure test. Results Backrest density had a significant effect on backrest pressure variables. CP and PCP increased with increasing backrest density. Contact area decreased with increased density. In terms of user preference, the backrest with low density was most highly rated. Conclusions Backrest density plays an important role in lumbar load and comfort during seated work. During designing and selecting backrests, backrest density should be focused on so as to alleviate and prevent low-back pain during seated office work. Backrest density at 10 kg/m^3 got the lowest CP and PCP and largest contact area. Backrest with low density can reduce lumbar pressure and increase support contact area, which could raise comfort feeling. Backrest density at 10 kg/m^3 is better to maintain a balance between providing effective support and alleviating excess lordosis. Background Seated workplaces have greatly increased in China. Many researchers have found that seated work is a risk factor in the development of low-back pain. Backrest can reduce the load on the lower back by transmitting more of the weight from the upper body to the floor via the backrest so as to prevent low-back pain. To design a suitable chair backrest for seated office work, some backrest parameters must be optimized. In this study, the role of backrest density on lumbar load and comfort were investigated. The goal of the study was to help establish criteria with which backrests that alleviate and prevent low back pain during seated office work can be designed and selected. Methods Twenty volunteers (10 men and 10 women) were seated in three backrest conditions (10 kg/m^3, 25 kg/m^3, and 40 kg/m^3). Pressure data, including contact pressure (CP), peak contact pressure (PCP) and contact area were collected during 15-minute trial. Subjective data were collected after each pressure test. Results Backrest density had a significant effect on backrest pressure variables. CP and PCP increased with increasing backrest density. Contact area decreased with increased density. In terms of user preference, the backrest with low density was most highly rated. Conclusions Backrest density plays an important role in lumbar load and comfort during seated work. During designing and selecting backrests, backrest density should be focused on so as to alleviate and prevent low-back pain during seated office work. Backrest density at 10 kg/m^3 got the lowest CP and PCP and largest contact area. Backrest with low density can reduce lumbar pressure and increase support contact area, which could raise comfort feeling. Backrest density at 10 kg/m^3 is better to maintain a balance between providing effective support and alleviating excess lordosis.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第19期3505-3508,共4页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 low-back pain SEATING backrest pressure COMFORT low-back pain seating backrest pressure comfort
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Harrison DD, Harrison SO, Croft AC, Harrison DE Troyanonich SJ. Sitting biomechanics part I: review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 44: 594-609.
  • 2Nachemson A, Elfstrom G. Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1970; 1: 1-40.
  • 3Bendix T, Winkel J, Jensen E Comparison of office chairs with fixed forwards or backwards inclining, or tiltable seats. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1985; 54: 378-385.
  • 4Chen YL. Effectiveness of a new back belt in the maintenance of lumbar lordosis while sitting: a pilot study.Int J Ind Ergonom 2003; 32: 299-303.
  • 5Corlett EN, Eklund JA. How does a backrest work? Appl Ergon 1984; 15: 111-114.
  • 6Boudrifa H, Davies BT. The effect of backrest inclination, lumbar support and thoracic support on erector spinae muscles when lifting. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1985; 54: 538-545.
  • 7Carcone SM, Keir PJ. Effects of backrest design on biomechanics and comfort during seated work. Appl Ergon 2007; 38: 755-764.
  • 8Kolich M, Essenmacher SD, McEvoy JT. Automotive seating: the effect of foam physical properties on occupied vertical vibration transmissibility. J Sound Vib 2005; 281: 409-416.
  • 9Mehta CR, Tewari VK. Damping characteristics of seat cushion materials for tractor ride comfort. J Terramechanics 2010; 47: 401-406.
  • 10Blood RE Ploger JD, Johnson PW. Whole body vibration exposures in forklift operators: comparison of a mechanical and air suspension seat. Ergonomics 2010; 53; 1385-1394.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部