期刊文献+

Comparing the deactivation behaviour of Co/CNT and Co/γ-Al_2O_3 nano catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis 被引量:4

Comparing the deactivation behaviour of Co/CNT and Co/γ-Al_2O_3 nano catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 An extensive study of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis on cobalt nano particles supported on γ-alumina and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) catalysts is reported.20 wt% of cobalt is loaded on the supports by impregnation method.The deactivation of the two catalysts was studied at 220 C,2 MPa and 2.7 L/h feed flow rate using a fixed bed micro-reactor.The calcined fresh and used catalysts were characterized extensively and different sources of catalyst deactivation were identified.Formation of cobalt-support mixed oxides in the form of xCoO yAl2O3 and cobalt aluminates formation were the main sources of the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst deactivation.However sintering and cluster growth of cobalt nano particles are the main sources of the Co/CNTs catalyst deactivation.In the case of the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst,after 720 h on stream of continuous FT synthesis the average cobalt nano particles diameter increased from 15.9 to 18.4 nm,whereas,under the same reaction conditions the average cobalt nano particles diameter of the Co/CNTs increased from 11.2 to 17.8 nm.Although,the initial FT activity of the Co/CNTs was 26% higher than that of the Co/γ-Al2O3,the FT activity over the Co/CNTs after 720 h on stream decreased by 49% and that over the Co/γ-Al2O3 by 32%.For the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst 6.7% of total activity loss and for the Co/CNTs catalyst 11.6% of total activity loss cannot be recovered after regeneration of the catalyst at the same conditions of the first regeneration step.It is concluded that using CNTs as cobalt catalyst support is beneficial in carbon utilization as compared to γ-Al2O3 support,but the Co/CNTs catalyst is more susceptible for deactivation. An extensive study of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis on cobalt nano particles supported on γ-alumina and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) catalysts is reported.20 wt% of cobalt is loaded on the supports by impregnation method.The deactivation of the two catalysts was studied at 220 C,2 MPa and 2.7 L/h feed flow rate using a fixed bed micro-reactor.The calcined fresh and used catalysts were characterized extensively and different sources of catalyst deactivation were identified.Formation of cobalt-support mixed oxides in the form of xCoO yAl2O3 and cobalt aluminates formation were the main sources of the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst deactivation.However sintering and cluster growth of cobalt nano particles are the main sources of the Co/CNTs catalyst deactivation.In the case of the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst,after 720 h on stream of continuous FT synthesis the average cobalt nano particles diameter increased from 15.9 to 18.4 nm,whereas,under the same reaction conditions the average cobalt nano particles diameter of the Co/CNTs increased from 11.2 to 17.8 nm.Although,the initial FT activity of the Co/CNTs was 26% higher than that of the Co/γ-Al2O3,the FT activity over the Co/CNTs after 720 h on stream decreased by 49% and that over the Co/γ-Al2O3 by 32%.For the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst 6.7% of total activity loss and for the Co/CNTs catalyst 11.6% of total activity loss cannot be recovered after regeneration of the catalyst at the same conditions of the first regeneration step.It is concluded that using CNTs as cobalt catalyst support is beneficial in carbon utilization as compared to γ-Al2O3 support,but the Co/CNTs catalyst is more susceptible for deactivation.
机构地区 School of Chemistry
出处 《Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry》 EI CAS CSCD 2012年第5期605-613,共9页 天然气化学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Fischer-Tropsch synthesis COBALT carbon nanotube Γ-ALUMINA DEACTIVATION Fischer-Tropsch synthesis cobalt carbon nanotube γ-alumina deactivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Tijmensen M J A, Faaij A P C, Hamelinck C N, van Hardeveld M R M. Biornass and Bioenergy, 2002, 23: 129.
  • 2Dry M E. Appl Catal A, 1999, 189: 185.
  • 3Zhang J L, Chen J A, Ren J, Li Y W, Sun Y H. Fuel, 2003, 82: 581.
  • 4Bukur D B, Lang X, Mukesh D, Zimmerman W H, Rosynek M P, Li C P. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1990, 29: 1588.
  • 5Tavasoli A, Rashidi A M, Sadaghiani Z K, Karimi A, Kodadadi A A, Mortazavi Y. EP Patent 1 782885.2007.
  • 6Tavasoli A, Sadagiani K, Khorashe F, Seifkordi A A, Rohaniab A A, Nakhaeipour A. Fuel Process Technol, 2007, 89: 491.
  • 7Tavasoli A, Irani M, Nakhaeipour A, Mortazavi Y, Khodadadi A A, Dalai A K. Iran J Chem & Chem Eng, 2009, 28: 37.
  • 8Tavasoli A, Abbaslou R M M, Trepanier M, Dalai A K. Appl Catal A, 2008, 345: 134.
  • 9Abbaslou R M M, Tavasoli A, Dalai A K. Appl Catal A, 2009, 355: 33.
  • 10Bezemer G L, Bitter J H, Kuipers H P C E, Oosterbeek H, Holewijn J E, Xu X D, Kapteijn F, van Dillen A J, de Jong K P. J Arn Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 3956.

同被引文献9

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部