一种新的学术期刊评价方法——因子理想解法被引量：11

A New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals:Factor Ideal Solution

下载PDF

导出

摘要针对因子分析和主成分分析在期刊评价中存在的问题,提出了一种新的学术期刊评价方法——因子理想解法,其原理是,首先采用因子分析筛选出关键因子,然后确定各关键因子的权重,在此基础上将关键因子标准化后采用加权TOPSIS进行评价。研究结果表明,因子理想解法能消除指标间的相关性导致的重复计算问题,具有较好的区分度,权重设置比较合理,距离函数采用直线距离也更加科学,可以在期刊评价中广泛进行运用。 To overcome the shortcoming of factor linalysis and principle component analysis in academic journals, this paper puts forward a new method, factor ideal solution （FIS）. The＇ fwst step of HS is to conduct key factors selection based on factor analysis, and then＇ to evaluate academic journals by weighted TOPSIS after key factors standardization. The results show that FIS may solve Repeat calculation caused by indictors＇ correlation and has good distinguish degree. The weight giving and distance function are also reasonable.

作者靖飞俞立平

机构地区渤海大学管理学院宁波大学商学院现代管理研究中心

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期22-26,共5页 Journal of Intelligence

基金国家社会科学基金后期资助课题"科技评价中多属性评价方法基本理论研究"(编号:10FTQ003)

关键词期刊评价因子理想解法因子分析TOPSIS academic journal evaluation factor ideal solution factor analysis TOPSIS

分类号 G301 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Garfield E. Citation Indexes in Sociological and Historical Re-search[J]. American Documentation,1963,14(4).289-291.
2Schubert A,Glanzel W,Braun T. Relative Citation Rate: A NewIndicator for Measuring the Impact of Publications[M]. In: D.Tomov, L. Dimitrova (eds) ’Proceeding of the First NationalConference with International Participation on Scientometrics andLinguistics of Scientific text, Vama,1983 :80-81.
3Vinkler P. Evaluation of Some Methods for the Relative Assess-ment of Scientific Publications[ J]. Scientometrics, 1986( 10) .157-177.
4BRAUN T, Glanzel W. World Flash on Basic Research. A Top-ographical Approach to World Publication Ou^mt and Perform-ance in Science[ J]. Scientometrics, 1990(19) :159-165.
5Moed H F,Debruin R E. New Bibliometric Tools for the Assess-ment of National Research Peiformance [ J]. Scientometrics,1995,33:381-422.
6Hirsch J E. An Index to Qualify an Individual's Scientific Re-search Output[M]. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sci-ences USA,2005:16569-16572.
7Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K,et al. Article-countImpact Factor of Materials Science Journals in SCI Database[J]. Scientometrics,2008,75(2): 251 - 261.
8张弘,赵惠祥,刘燕萍,陶文文.基于主成分分析法的科技期刊评价方法[J].编辑学报,2008,20(1):87-90. 被引量：64
9张寅,王岩,王惠文.重点学术期刊专项基金管理中的期刊评价——基于简化的区间数据主成分分析方法[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(7):88-94. 被引量：10
10甘胜进.基于非线性主成分方法的科技期刊综合评价[J].湖北师范学院学报（自然科学版）,2011,31(2):35-38. 被引量：3