期刊文献+

MRI对乳腺X线摄影中含成簇微钙化病变的诊断 被引量:8

MRI in the diagnosis of breast lesions with clustered micro-calcifications showing on mammography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨乳腺磁共振成像对乳腺X线摄影中含成簇微钙化病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法:搜集行乳腺钙化灶立体定位下活检术或术前钩丝定位局切活检术的97例病例,所有患者术前均行乳腺X线摄影和MRI检查且病灶钙化表现为成簇微钙化灶,分析含不同形态成簇微钙化病变的MRI表现及其鉴别诊断价值,并与组织病理学结果进行对照。结果:病灶总数为97个,其中病理结果为良性者73个(75.3%),恶性24个(24.7%)。良恶性病变乳腺X线上表现均以无定形钙化为主者,分别占57.5%(42/73)、37.5%(9/24)。MRI对含成簇微钙化的恶性病灶诊断的阳性预测值72.4%(21/29)高于乳腺X线摄影28.9%(22/76)(P=0.000)。MRI对含成簇无定形钙化的恶性病灶诊断的阳性预测值66.7%(8/12)高于乳腺X线摄影17.6%(9/51)(P=0.002)。MRI上节段性强化诊断恶性病变的阳性预测值为100.0%(9/9);无强化对诊断含成簇钙化病变的阴性预测值为100.0%(9/9)。含成簇微钙化的恶性病变早期强化率平均值为109.6%±78.5%,高于良性病变62.8%±25.9%(P=0.000)。结论:MRI对含成簇微钙化特别是无定形成簇微钙化的乳腺病变具有较好的鉴别诊断价值。 Objective:To assess the value of breast MRI in the differentiatial diagnosis of lesions with clustered micro- calcifications on mammography. Methods: 97 patients, all had mammography and MRI showing clustered micro-calcifica- tions,underwent stereoradiography-guided vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy or excisional biopsy with hook wire localiza- tion. The MRI findings were correlated with pathology and the characteristics of the lesions on MRI which contained differ- ent types of clustered micro-calcifications and their value of differential diagnosis were analyzed. Results: Totally 97 lesions were included, seventy-three (75.3 %) of them were benign and the other 24 (24.7 ~/00 ) were malignant diagnosed by pathol- ogy. Amorphous micro-calcifications were the main feature of micro-calcifications no matter in benign or malignant lesions (57.5 ~ vs 37.5 ~). The positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI in the diagnosis of clustered micro-calcifications in malig- nant breast lesion was 72.4% (21/29 lesions) ,which was higher than that of mammography (28.9 % ,22/76 lesions) (P-- 0. 000). The PPV of segmental enhancement on MRI in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100% and the negative predictive value (NPV) of lesions with clustered micro-calcifications yet with no enhancement on MRI was also 100% (9/9 lesions). The mean of early phase enhancement rate on MRI in the malignant lesion with clustered micro calcifications was 109.6 % 78.5% ,which was higher than that o{ benign lesions (62. 8% 25. 9%),with statistically significant difference (P= 0. 000). Conclusions.. MRI is valuable in the differential diagnosis of lesions with clustered micro-calcifications especially clustered amorphous micro-calcifications showing on mammography.
出处 《放射学实践》 2012年第10期1089-1094,共6页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 磁共振成像 诊断 乳房X线摄影术 Magnetic resonance imagingl Diagnosisl Mammography
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system:BI-RADS atlas [M]. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003 : 118-119.
  • 2Houserkova D, Prasad SN, Svach I, et al. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI- RADS 5 microealcification[J]. Biomed Pap Med Fae Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2008,152 (1) : 107-115.
  • 3Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedletal CC, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study[J]. AJR, 2002, 179(6) : 1503-1507.
  • 4Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, et al. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications:pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy[J]. Radiology, 2001,221(2) : 495-503.
  • 5Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007, 103 (3) : 269-281.
  • 6ErOrsi CJ. The American college of radiology mammography lexi- con:an initial attempt to standardize terminology [J]. AJR, 1996, 166(4) :779-780.
  • 7Stomper PC,Connolly JL. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor sub- type[J]. AJR,1992,159(3) :483-485.
  • 8Liberman L,Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging:features and positive predictive value[J]. AJR, 2002, 179(1) : 171-178.
  • 9Nunes LW,Schnall MD,Orel SG,et al. Breast MR imaging:inter- pretation model[J]. Radiology,1997,202(3) :833-841.
  • 10Nunes LW,Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic perform- ance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast[J]. AJR, 1997,169 (2) :409- 415.

二级参考文献21

  • 1[1]Kuhl CK.MRI of breast tumors.Eur Radiol 2000;10:46~ 58
  • 2[2]Kuhl CK,Mielcarek P,Klaschik S,et al.Are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MR imaging?Radiology 1999;211:101~ 110
  • 3[3]Nunes LW,Schnall MD,Orel SG,et al.Breast MR imaging: interpretation model.Radiology 1997:202:833~ 841
  • 4[4]Mussurakis S,Gibbs P,Horsman.A peripgeral enhanced and spatial contrast uptake heerogeneity of primary breast tumors :quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:35~ 46
  • 5[5]Buadu LD,Murakami J Murayuma S,et al.Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses :correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:421~ 430
  • 6[6]Hochman MG,Orel SG,Powell CM,et al.Fibroadenomas:MR imaging appearances with radiologic- histopathologic correlation.Radiology 1997;204;123~ 129
  • 7[7]Heywang- K brunner SH,Bick U,Bradley JrWG,et al.International investigation of MRI :results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast- enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesion.Eur Radiol 2001;11:531~ 546
  • 8Recht A,Rutgers EJ,Fentiman IS,et al.The fourth EORTC DCIS Consensus meeting (Chateau Marquette,Heemskerk,The Netherlands,23-24 January 1998)-conference report[J].Eur J Cancer,1998,34(11):1664-1669.
  • 9Ernster VL,Barclay J,Kerlikowske K,et al.Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance,epidemiology and end results program[J].Arch Intern Med,2000,160(7):953-958.
  • 10Kuhl CK.MRI of breast tumors[J].Eur Radiol,2000,10 (1):46-58.

共引文献22

同被引文献46

  • 1赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:147
  • 2汪晓红,彭卫军,杨文涛,顾雅佳,杨天锡.乳腺纤维腺瘤的MRI表现及与病理对照[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):467-471. 被引量:29
  • 3马捷,徐坚民,孙国平,左敏,王晓玫,王国红,臧达,杨忠,彭东红,周冬仙,麦佩成.乳腺结构扭曲征象的X线分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(4):527-531. 被引量:13
  • 4Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin Boblet V, et al. Breast micro - calcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma [ J ]. World J Surg, 2002,26 ( 3 ) : 290 - 296.
  • 5Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, et al. The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifica tions on mam- mography [ J ]. Eur Radiol,2009,19 (9) : 2089 - 2096.
  • 6Uematsu T,Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Dynamic co ntrast - en- hanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalc fication lesions of the breast: is there any value [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2007,103 ( 3 ) :269 -281.
  • 7Fiaschetti V, Pistolese C A, Perretta T, et al. 3 -5 BI - RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MR[ and His- tological Findings[J]. Isrn Oncology, 2011,2011:643890.
  • 8Jiang Y, Lou J, Wang S, et al. Evaluation of the Role of Dynamic Contrast - Enhanced MR Imaging for Patients with BI - RADS 3 - 4 Microcalcifications [ J ]. Plos One, 2014, 9(6) :99669.
  • 9JLUJU -- JL IUi. Guo Y, Cai Y Q, Cai Z L, et al. Differentiation of clini- cally benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion - weighted imaging[ J ]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2002, 16(2) :172.
  • 10Fatma Zeinhom Moukhtar, Amal Amin Abu El Maati. Ap- parent diffusion coefficient values as an adjunct to dynam- ic contrast enhanced MRI for discriminating benign and malignant breast lesions presenting as mass and non - mass likeenhancement[ J~. The Egyptian Journal of Radi- ology and Nuclear Medicine ,2014,45 (2) : 597 - 604.

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部