期刊文献+

发酵床模式饲养肉鸭效果观察 被引量:4

原文传递
导出
摘要 为研究发酵床养鸭效果,选取1 980只肉鸭分成2组,每组3个重复,每重复330只肉鸡,试验组使用发酵床饲养,对照组采用网架饲养。考察不同饲养模式对肉鸭生产性能、屠宰性能及器官指数的影响。结果表明:发酵床和网架饲养方式对肉鸭生产性能和器官指数各项指标没有显著性差异,发酵床组略占优势。发酵床组和网架组的囊肿率差异极显著,发酵床组比网架组低60.52%。发酵床的应用不会降低肉鸭的生产性能且改善鸭的外观,并具有降低发病率的作用,可以达到节省劳动力,并达到少排放且少污染环境的效果。
出处 《饲料研究》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第10期78-80,共3页 Feed Research
基金 四川农业大学校内教改项目 优秀本科生论文培育项目
关键词 发酵床 养鸭 效果
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1胡庸,罗士仙,李春林.改善猪肉品质的综合措施[J].江西畜牧兽医杂志,2006,25(2):17-18. 被引量:6
  • 2施光发,甘友保,朱冠元,何柏水,丁正金.土壤微生物发酵床养猪技术[J].畜牧与兽医,2006,38(3):59-59. 被引量:31
  • 3刘振钦,李宏伟,王建全,沈红,苏占峰.发酵床养猪与水泥圈舍养猪效果比较[J].养殖技术顾问,2007(3):10-10. 被引量:32
  • 4Philippea F X, Laitat M, Canart B,et al. Comparison of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during the fattening of pigs, kept either on fully slatted flour or on deep litter[ J]. Livestock Science, 2007,111 : 144 -152.
  • 5中华人民共和国农业行业标准.农产品安全质量无公害畜禽肉产地环境要求[S].GB/T18407.3-2001.
  • 6Karlen G A M, Hemsworth P H,Gonyou H W,et aL The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter[ J]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science,2007,105: 87 - 101.
  • 7Jeppsson K H. Carbon dioxide emission and water evaporation from deep litter systems[J].J. Agric. Engng. Rcs. , 2000,77 (4) :429 -440.
  • 8Nicks B, Laitat M, Farnir F, et al. Gaseous emissions from deep -litter pens with straw or sawdust for fattening pigs[ J]. Animal Science, 2004,78:99 - 107.
  • 9Hahn JD,Biehl RR,Baker DH.Ideal digestible lysine level for early-and late-finishing swine[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(3):773-774.
  • 10Camou P,Sebranek J G.Gelation characteristics of muscle protein from pale,soft,exudative (PSE) pork[J].Meat science,1999,30(3):207-220.

共引文献99

同被引文献52

  • 1孙平风,王建,洪晓文.蛋鸭离河生态养殖模式研究[J].浙江畜牧兽医,2005,30(1):5-5. 被引量:9
  • 2江宵兵.不同饲养方式对蛋鸭生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(9):43-45. 被引量:19
  • 3Jones T A, Dawkina M S. Environment and management fac-tors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on commer-cial farms in the UK [J]. British Poultry Science, 2010,51(1):12-21.
  • 4Wechsler B,Huber-Eicher B. The effect of foraging materialand perch height on feather pecking and feather damage inlaying hens [J]. Appl Ani Behav Sci,1998,58:131-141.
  • 5Stub C, Ritskes-Hoitinga M,Thon R,et al. Fluctuating asym-metry in mice and rats:Evaluation of the method [J]. Labora-tory Animal,2002,36 : 193-199.
  • 6Cotton S,Praley G S. The effects of environmental enrichmentdevices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks[J]. Poul Sci,2014,93(9) :2143-2150.
  • 7Driscoll K K M, Broom D M. Environment, well-being, andbehavior:Does access to open water affect the health of Pekinducks (Anas platyrhynchos) . [J]. Poul Sci, 2011,90( 2) : 299 -307.
  • 8Knierim U, Van Dongen S. Forkman B, et al. Fluctuating a-symmetry as an animal welfare indicator: A review of method-,ology and validity [J]. Physiol Behav, 2007, 92 ( 3): 398421.
  • 9Ventura B A,Siewerdt F.Estevez I. Effects of barrier perchesand density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance [J].Poul Sci,2010,89(8);1574-1583.
  • 10Tuyttens F,Heyndrickx M, l)e Boeck M,et al. Broiler chick-en health, welfare and fluctuating asymmet.ry in organic ver-sus conventional production systems [J]. Lives Sci * 2008, 1 13(2/3):123-132.

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部