期刊文献+

日本知识产权司法改革及其借鉴 被引量:16

IPR Judicial Reform in Japan and Its Experience
原文传递
导出
摘要 进入21世纪,日本开始实施国家知识产权战略。为了加强知识产权的司法保护,在充分论证的基础上,日本进行了一系列重大的知识产权司法改革。2003年民事诉讼法的修改中,对知识产权案件管辖作了较大调整,设立五人合议庭制,引入专业委员制度;2004年通过了《知识产权高等法院设置法》;强化法院调查官作用。上述改革提升了日本知识产权司法保护的专业化、高效化。我国应在借鉴日本经验的同时,结合国情,设立知识产权上诉法院,推广知识产权庭三审合一,加强专家辅助人制度。通过优化知识产权审判资源配置,实现知识产权审判专业化,提高诉讼效率,保证司法统一。 Japan began to implement the national intellectual property strategy from the early period of the 21st century.In order to strengthen judicial protection of IPR,Japan has carried out a series of significant intellectual property judicial reforms based on sufficient demonstration.For examples,Japan made a major adjustment on the jurisdiction of intellectual property case to set up the Grand Panel of five judges and to introduce Technical Advisor system when the Code of Civil Procedure had been amended in 2003;The Law for Establishing the IP High Court was passed in 2004;Moreover,the role of the investigating officer of the Court has been strengthened.These reforms have promoted the specialization and high efficiency of Japan's judicial protection of IPR.It will be wise for us to take the Japanese experience based on our national situations simultaneously to establish appellate courts for intellectual property,to advocate the model of combining IPR civil,administrative and criminal trials in one tribunal("three-in-one") and to reinforce expert advisor system.Then we will achieve the specialization of IP trial work to improve the litigation efficiency and to ensure the uniformity of justice.
作者 张玲
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期121-132,共12页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基金 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJFX11-038)
关键词 日本 知识产权 司法改革 Japan Intellectual Property Right Judicial Reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1闫文军.日本知识产权审判情况概要[J].电子知识产权,2005(3):54-57. 被引量:10
  • 2张玉瑞,韩秀成.《有关专门知识产权法院和审判庭的国际调研》.
  • 3International Bar A iation Intelleetual Property And Entertainment Committee, International Survey of Specialized Intelleetual Property Courts and Tribunal, London ,February 2005.
  • 4曹新明.《建立我国统一知识产权法院的问题初探》,中国法学会知识产权研究会2005年年会暨专利法修改研讨会论文集.
  • 5[德]K,茨威格特,H.克茨.《比较法总论》,潘汉典等译,法律出版社,2003年版,第144页.
  • 6其专门性网站.http://www.ip.courts.go.jp/chi/mdex.html.
  • 7See Australian Government Development of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Enforcement of Property Rights, available at www.dfat,gov.au.
  • 8梁熙艳.“日本:审理侵权的法院是否可以对专利权的有效性进行判断”.http://www.chinaipdaw.cn/file/200501184068.html.
  • 9International Bar Association Intellectual Property And Entertainment Committee, International Survey of Specialized Intellectual Property Courts and Tribunals, London,February 2005.
  • 10Katsumi shinohara, Outline of the Intellectual property High Court of Japan, AIPPI Journal, May 2005, pp131-147.

共引文献41

同被引文献175

引证文献16

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部