摘要
目的评价赌博冲动量表中文版(GUS-C)的信度和效度,为该量表在中国大陆的推广使用提供科学依据。方法采用分层随机抽样方法在辽宁、山东、河南、湖北、湖南、福建6省抽取730名≥18岁中国大陆常住居民进行问卷调查;采用同质性信度、分半信度、重测信度进行信度评价,采用效标关联效度和结构效度进行效度评价。结果项目分析结果表明,GUS-C量表6个条目与其总分相关系数为0.648～0.838,CR值为8.797～29.525(均P<0.01);GUS-C量表总体Cronbach’sα系数、分半信度和重测信度分别为0.834、0.813、0.819,条目间平均相关系数为0.531;赌博相关认知量表(GRCS-C)总分及其赌博期待、控制错觉、预测控制、无力戒赌、解释偏差5个维度得分与GUS-C量表总分的Pearson相关系数为0.359～0.570(均P<0.01),抑郁焦虑压力中文简体版(DASS-21)总分及其抑郁、焦虑、压力3个维度得分与GUS-C量表总分的Pearson相关系数为0.238～0.307(均P<0.01);验证性因素分析结果表明,拟合指标GFI=0.98、AGFI=0.97、CFI=0.99、RFI=0.98、RMSEA=0.053,各条目因素负荷分别为0.81、0.41、0.78、0.88、0.72、0.84;中国大陆居民男性和女性GUS-C量表得分分别为(10.66±7.41)和(9.16±5.62)分,均高于中国台湾居民及在澳华人的(9.18±6.29)和(7.84±4.10)分以及澳大利亚居民的(8.31±4.73)和(6.98±2.41)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 GUS-C量表具有较好的信度和效度,可作为中国大陆居民赌博冲动评价的有效工具。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Gambling Urge Scale（GUS-C） in Chinese population.Methods The questionnaire was administered to 730 Chinese people（18 years old）.The internal consistent reliability,split-half reliability,test-retest reliability,construct validity,and criterion-related validity of the scale were examined.Results Item analyses showed that comparative ratio（CR） values ranged from 8.797 to 29.525（P0.01） and the correlations between the items and the total score were 0.238-0.307（P0.01）.Cronbach＇s α coefficient,the split-half reliability coefficient,and one-week test-retsest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0.834,0.813,and 0.819,respectively.The inter-item mean correlations was 0.531.The Pearson correlation coefficients between the GUS-C and Chinese Vesion of Gambling Related Cognition（GURC-C）（including the total and five subscales）were 0.359-0.570（P0.01）,and the Pearson correlation coefficients between the GUS-C and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21（DASS-21）（including total and three subscales） were 0.238-0.307（P0.01）.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the one factor model fits the data well,with the goodness of fit index（GFI） of 0.98,adjusted goodness of fit index（AGFI） of 0.97,comparative fit index（CFI） of 0.98,relative fit index（RFI） of 0.98,and mean root square error of approximation（RMSEA） of 0.053.The score of GUS-C of males（10.66±7.41） amd females（9.16±5.62）from China's Mainland were significant higher than Chinese in Taiwan and Australia（P0.01 for all）.Conclusion The Chinese Version of Gambling Urge Scale has good reliability and validity and could be used as an effective tool for assessing gambling urge in mainland Chinese.
出处
《中国公共卫生》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第10期1310-1312,共3页
Chinese Journal of Public Health
