摘要
目的探讨切开复位普通钢板内固定和锁定加压钢板内固定治疗Pilon骨折临床疗效的差异性。方法对128例Pilon骨折随机采用切开复位普通钢板内固定和锁定加压钢板内固定治疗。对临床疗效、手术时间、骨折平均愈合时间、并发症发生情况等进行统计分析。结果随访4～20个月,两组患者在临床疗效、骨折平均愈合时间、并发症发生率等方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定治疗Pilon骨折具有疗效好、骨折愈合率高、并发症少等特点,可作为治疗Pilon骨折的首选方法。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy differences of plate fixed and open reduction Locking Compression of Pilon fracture.Methods Pilon fractures of 128 cases were randomly divided into plate fixation and locking compression plate.Clinical efficacy,operative time,mean fracture healing time and complications were statistically analyzed.Results The follow-up 4 to 20 months.The clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients,the mean fracture healing time,complication rates were significantly different（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Locking Compression plate fixation for treatment of Pilon fractures with good efficacy and high rate of fracture healing,fewer complications and so on,it was the preferred method as the treatment of Pilon fractures.
出处
《中外医疗》
2012年第26期22-23,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
