期刊文献+

凡德他尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的Meta分析 被引量:5

Meta-Analysis of Vandetanib in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的系统评价凡德他尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及其安全性。方法电子检索Medline(1966~2011),Cochrane Library(2011年第11期),EM base(1974~2011),CNKI(1978~2011),维普(1989~2011),CBM disc(1978~2011)等数据库,对符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT),采用Rev Man 5.1.2软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入5个RCT,共3473例病。Meta分析结果显示:在所有入选的文献当中,凡德他尼单用或联合化疗药物治疗晚期NSCLC能显著提高客观缓解率(ORR)[OR=1.66,95%CI(1.13,2.46),P=0.01],在无进展生存期(PFS)方面,只有1个RCT结果显示与对照组相比,试验组PFS显著提高且有统计学意义[HR=0.79,97.58%CI(0.70,0.90),P<0.0001],其余RCT结果均显示两组间差异无统计学意义;所有RCT结果均显示总生存率(OS)在试验组与对照组间均无明显差异;在症状恶化时间(TDS)方面,有两个RCT进行了分析且差异具有统计学意义,分别是[HR=0.77,97.5%CI(0.65,0.92),P=0.0008]和[HR=0.71,97.5%CI(0.54,0.94),P=0.0052(2-sided)]。在不良反应方面,凡德他尼单用或联合化疗会使腹泻[RR=1.34,95%CI(1.23,1.46),P<0.00001]、高血压[RR=6.00,95%CI(3.75,9.62),P<0.00001],粒细胞减少[RR=1.19,95%CI(1.02,1.39),P=0.02]、失眠[RR=1.32,95%CI(1.01,1.72),P=0.05]的发生率显著增加,且具有统计学意义。结论凡德他尼单用或联合其它化疗药物治疗NSCLC疗效比不含凡德他尼的化疗方案更好,但同时也增加了腹泻、高血压、粒细胞减少和失眠的发生率,在临床应用时需注意预防和对症治疗。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vandetanib as the treatment drug for patients with ad vanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Several databases including Medline(1966 - 2011), Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2011), EMbase (1974 - 2011), CNKI(1978 - 2011), VIP(1989 - 2011) and CBMdisc (1978 - 2011) were electronically searched, and meta-analysis was undertaken to analyze the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria by using the Cochrane Collaboration' s RevMan 5.1.2 soft-vare. Results Five RCTs with a total of 3473 cases were included. According to the results of Meta-analysis, in comparison with the control group, vandetanib increased the objective response rate(ORR)[OR=1.66, 95 % CI(1.13, 2.46), P= 0.01]. Only one of the RCTs showed the significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) [HR=0.79, 97.58 % CI (0.70, 0.90), P 〈 0.000 1]. None of the study showed the significant improvement in overall survival(OS) in vandetanib-treated group. Two RCTs had reported the TDS significantly raised in vandetanib-treated groups [HIL=0.77, 97.5%CI(0.65, 0.92), and HR=0.71, 97.5 % Cl (0.54, 0.94) respectively]. The incidence of adve-e effects happened during the treatment were also analyzed, and treatment with vandetanib significantly increased the incidence rates of diarrhea [RR=l,34, 95%CI (1.23, 1.46), P 〈 0,000 01 ], hypertension [RR=6.00, 95 % CI (3.75, 9.62), P 〈 0.000 01 ], neutropenia [R1L= 1.19, 95 % CI (1.02, 1.39), P = 0.02 ], insomnia [ RR= 1.32, 95 % CI ( 1.01, 1.72), P = 0.05 ]. Conclusion In comparison with other chemotherapy regimens, vandetanib alone or combined with other chemotherapetltics had better therapeutic effects on NSCLC, mean- while, it increased the incidence rates of adverse effects such as diarrhea, hypertension, neutropenia and insomnia, which should be prevented and symptomatically treated.
出处 《肿瘤药学》 CAS 2012年第5期385-391,共7页 Anti-Tumor Pharmacy
基金 湖南省科技厅科技计划项目资助(2012SK3249)
关键词 凡德他尼 非小细胞肺癌 治疗 META分析 Vandetanib NSCLC Non-srmall-cell lung cancer Treatment Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics,2002[J].CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2005,(02):74-108.
  • 2Syrigos KN,Saif MW,Karapanagiotou EM. The need for third-line treatment in non-small cell lung can-cer:an overview of new options[J].Anticancer Research,2011,(02):649-659.
  • 3Rivera MP. Multimodality therapy in the treatment of lung cancer[J].Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,2004,(Suppl 1):3-10.
  • 4包婺平,金先桥.非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗药物临床评价[J].世界临床药物,2011,32(2):75-82. 被引量:2
  • 5赵兴旺,赵临襄.凡德他尼[J].中国药物化学杂志,2011,21(5):405-405. 被引量:3
  • 6周彩存.个体化治疗时代多靶点药物究竟何去何从——多靶点药物治疗非小细胞肺癌最新临床进展综述[J].中国肺癌杂志,2011,14(11):874-879. 被引量:11
  • 7Heymach JV,Johnson BE,Prager D. Randomized,Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Vandetanib Plus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2007,(27):4270-4277.
  • 8Heymach JV,Paz-Ares L,Filippo De Braud. Ran-domized Phase II Study of Vandetanib Alone or With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2008,(33):5407-5415.
  • 9Herbst RS,Sun Y,Wilfried EE Eberhardt. Van-detanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(ZODIAC):a double-blind,randomized,phase 3 trial[J].The Lancet Oncology,2010,(07):619-626.
  • 10Natale RB,Thongprasert S,Greco F A. Phase III Trial of Vandetanib Compared With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011,(08):1059-1066.

二级参考文献70

  • 1韩文峰,魏素菊.非小细胞肺癌分子靶向治疗药物研究进展[J].河北医科大学学报,2009,30(10):1088-1092. 被引量:2
  • 2于春虎,张魁灵.晚期非小细胞肺癌的化疗新进展[J].实用全科医学,2005,3(1):74-75. 被引量:31
  • 3Fukuoka M, Wu YP, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses from a phase llI, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib (G) versus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) in clinically selected patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asia (IPASS) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15) : abstr 8006.
  • 4Kobayashi K, Inoue A, Maemondo M, et al. First-line gefitinib versus first-line chemotherapy by carboplatin (CBDCA) plus paclitaxel (TXL) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations: a phase III study (002) by North east Japan Gefitinib Study Group [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15) : abatr 8016.
  • 5Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. SATURN: a double-blind, randomized, phase III study of maintenance erlotinib versus placebo following nonprogression with first- line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15) : abstr 8001.
  • 6Janne PA, Wang XF, Socinski MA, et al. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib (E) alone or in combination with carboplatilVpaclitaxel (CP) in never or light former smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: CALGB 30406 [J]. J Clin Oncology, 2010, 28 (15) : 7503.
  • 7Yang C, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, et al. Phase II b/ III double blind randomized trial of BIBW 2992, an irreversible, dual inhibitor of EGFR and HER2 plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with NSCLC failing 1-2 lines of chemotherapy (CT) and erlotinib or gefitinib (LUX-Lung l): a preliminary report[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15): abstr 8062.
  • 8Laurie SA, Arnold A, Shepherd FA, et al. Randomizes, double-blind phase II trial of carboplatin+paclitaxel (C+P) with either daily oral cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinases [J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 19 (Suppl 8) : 90-91.
  • 9Herbst RS, Sun Y, Korfee R et al. Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) : a randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZODIAC) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15) : abstr 407.
  • 10De Boer R, Arrieta O, Gottfired M, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed versus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) : a randomized, doubleblind phase iII trial (ZEAL) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl 15) : abstr 8010.

共引文献15

同被引文献71

引证文献5

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部