期刊文献+

舒芬太尼复合七氟醚用于老年患者麻醉诱导的临床观察 被引量:3

Clinical observation of the sufentanil combined with sevoflurane for anesthesia induction in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察舒芬太尼复合七氟醚用于老年患者麻醉诱导时的临床效果。方法选择择期行腹部手术患者84例,根据七氟醚麻醉诱导时舒芬太尼不同用量,随机分为4组,A组舒芬太尼剂量为0.25μg/kg,B组0.05μg/kg,C组0.75μg/kg,D组1.00μg/kg,每组21例。记录患者进入手术室后10min(T0)、插管前即刻(T1)、插管后即刻(T2)、插管后1min(Ts)、3min(Tt)、5rain(Ts)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率,并对各组的插管条件进行评分。结果拔管后10min、30min、60min视觉模拟评分(VAs)A组分别为(4.2±0.9、3.5±0.7、4.2±0.4)分,B组分别为(4.0±0.4、3.2±0.8、3.8±0.7)分,c组分别为(3.4±1.0、1.7±1.4、2.6±0.6)分,D组分别为(2.7±0.2、1.9±0.4、1.7±0.8)分;Ramsay评分A组分别为(1.4±1.1、0.8±0.1、2.8±0.1)分,B组分别为(2.2±2.3、1.3±0.4、2.2±0.2)分,C组分别为(2.8±1.7、1.9±0.1、2.0±0.1)分,D组分别为(3.7±2.0、2.4±0.6、2.9±0.1)分;4组患者拔管后各时点,VAS和Ramsay评分为D组〉C组〉B组〉A组(F=5.78,P〈0.05)。T0、T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时点平均动脉压(MAP)A组分别为(93.8±8.1、82.1±4.3、92.8±5.9、90.1±4.8、85.3±4.2、78.0±3.5)mmHg,B组分别为(91.8±6.8、83.4±4.5、87.2±5.1、84.2±5.2、85.6±2.8、84.4±3.6)mmHg,C组分别为(92.8±5.2、82.1±6.0、80.1±4.2、78.0±2.9、75.4±3.3、65.4±5.2)mmHg,D组分别为(88.5±6.3、75.9±4.5、80.1±2.8、76.1±2.3、69.3土3.8、68.9±4.9)mmHg;心率A组分别为(74.2±2.3、68.8±4.9、82.4±4.2、86.4±3.7、80.2±5.1、67.2±4.7)次/min,B组分别为(75.6±1.2、63.8±5.9、78.2±3.9、79.3±5.6、76.3±6.7、64.8±3.9)次/min,C组分别为(76.7±6.1、65.5±5.6、80.4±5.1、76.5±4.3、78.7±3.1、66.1±4.8)次/min,D组分别为(77.5±5.8、75.0±3.8、63.4±5.1、78.8±3.9、79.1土2.5、62.8±4.3)次/min;T1与T0比较,4组MAP下降、HR减慢(F=34.99,P〈0.05),T2时A组MAP升高(F=12.48,P〈0.05)。与A组比较,T4、T5时C、D组MAP下降(F=6.98,6.25,均P〈0.05);与B组比较,T2~T3时C、D组MAP下降(F=7.08,20.56,均P〈0.05)。结论舒芬太尼0.25~0.50μg/kg复合七氟醚用于老年患者手术麻醉诱导,能提供较好的插管条件和稳定的血流动力学。 Objective To observe the clinical effects of sufentanil combined with sevoflurane for anesthesia induction in the elderly. Methods A total of 84 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic were randomly divided into 4 groups by dose of Sufentanil ( 21 eases, each) 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 μg/kg sufentanil. Mean arterial pressure (MAP)and heart rate (HR)were measured at baseline (To), immediately before intubation(T1), immediately, 1, 3 and 5 min after intubation (T2-5). Intubation scores were also recorded. Results The intubation scores including visual analogue score (VAS) and Ramsay score at 10 min, 30 min and 60 min after tube drawing were as the following sequence: 1.0 μg/kg :〉0.75 μg/kg :〉0.5μg/kg ~0.25 txg/kg sufentanil (F= 5.78,P^0.05). Compared with TO, MAP and HR decreased in each group at T1, while increased at T2 in group A (P d0.05). As compared with TO, MAP was decreased and HR was slower at T1 in the 4 groups (F= 34.99,P^0.05), but MAP level was increased in 0.25 /~g/kg sufentanil group at T2 (F= 12.48,P~ 0.05). Compared with group of 0.25 ~g/kg sufentanil, MAP was reduced in 0.75μg/kg and 1.00 gg/ kg groups at T4 and T5 (F=6.98,6.25,P^0.05). MAP was also lower in 0.75 μg/kg and 1.00 μg/ kg groups than in 0.50/xg/kg sufentanil group at T2-TS(F=7.08,20.56,P-0.05). Conclusions Sufentanil of 0.25 0.50 μg/kg combined with sevoflurane can provide excellent intubating conditions and stable hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期854-856,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 舒芬太尼 异氟醚 麻醉药 全身 Sufentanil Sevoflurane Anesthetics, general
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1史春霞,李立环,卿恩明,姜贞,李士通,姚尚龙,郭曲练,王文贤,熊利泽,张铁铮,齐娟,付志俭.舒芬太尼麻醉用于心血管手术的多中心临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(8):519-521. 被引量:114
  • 2Meretoja OA,Taivainen T, Raiha L, et al. Sevofluranenitrous oxide or halothane-nitrous oxide for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy. Br J Anaesth, 1996,76 :767-771.
  • 3Ekman A, Lindholm ML, Lennmarken C, et al. Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. Aeta An-aestheiol Scand , 2004,48 : 20-26.
  • 4陈轶菁,连文洁,汪春英.七氟醚吸入麻醉对乳腺癌根治术病人血浆儿茶酚胺的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):645-647. 被引量:12
  • 5Hentgen E, Houfani M, Billard V, et al. Propofol-sufentanil anesthesia for thyroid surgery: optimal concentrations for hemodynamic and electroencephalogram stability, and recovery features. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 : 597-605.
  • 6Pandin PC, Cantraine F, Ewalenko P, et al. Predictive accuracy of target-controlled propofol and sufentanil coinfusion in longlasting surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000,93 : 653-661.
  • 7Duke T. A new intravenous anesthetic agent: propofol. Can Vet J, 1995,36:181-183.
  • 8Kazama T. Ikeda K, Morita K. et al. Relation between initial blood distribution volume and propofol induction dose requirement. Anesthesiology. 2001,94 : 205-210.
  • 9Gurses E. Sungurtekin H, Tomatir E, et al. Assessing propofol induction of anesthesia dose using bispectral index analysis. Anesth Analg, 2004.98 : 128-131.
  • 10Thomson IR, Moon M, Hudson RJ, et al. Does sufentanil concentration influence isoflurane requirements during coronary artery bypass grafting? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1999, 13:9-14.

共引文献45

同被引文献19

  • 1Chahal J, Marks PH, MacDonald PB, et al. Anatomic bankart repair compared with nonoperative treatment and/or arthroscopic lavage for first time traumatic shoulder dislocation. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28: 1022-1024.
  • 2Tudor BC, Norris RE, Wang EE. Anterior shoulder dislocation: the scapular manipulation technique. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2010, 17 : 40.
  • 3Elham P. Scapular manipulation for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation without analgesia., reply to comment. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2012, 24: 348-349.
  • 4Liavaag S, Stiris MG, Svenningsen S, et al. Capsular lesions with glenohumeral ligament injuries in patients with primary shoulder dislocation: magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine ~ Science in Sports, 2011, 21:291- 297.
  • 5Thompson JP, cardiovascular West K J, responses to double The lumen endobrochial intubation and the effect of esmolol[J] Anaesthesia, 1997, 52(8): 790 -794.
  • 6Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, et al. Complications related to the pressor response to endotraeheal intubation [J] Anesthesiology, 1997, 47 ( 6 ): 524-525.
  • 7Edwards ND, Alford AM, Dobson PMS, et al. Myocardial isehaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation[J]. BrJ Anaesth, 1994, 73(4): 537-539.
  • 8Yeganeh N, Roshani B, Latifi N, et al. Comparison of target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and remifentanil in blunting hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation[J]. J Inj Violence Res, 2013, 5 (2) .. 101-107. DOI..10. 5249/jivr. v5i2. 325.
  • 9Ismail S, Azam SI, Khan FA. Effect of age on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. A comparison of young, middle-aged and elderly patients[J]. Anesth Intensive Care, 2002, 30 (5): 608-614.
  • 10Casati A, Fanelli G, Albertin A, et ah Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation: a double blind comparison [J] Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2001, 18(2) : 108-112.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部