期刊文献+

重金属污染沉积物质量评价研究-以太湖为例 被引量:17

Quality assessment technology of sediment polluted by heavy metals of the Taihu Lake
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以太湖的表层沉积物为研究对象,运用相平衡分配法(EqP)探讨了沉积物中4种重金属(Cu,Pb,Zn,Cd)的沉积物质量基准(CSQC)值;根据美国国家环境保护局(US EPA)基于水生生物对重金属的最终慢性毒理水平的淡水水质基准,制定了太湖4种重金属(Cu,Pb,Zn,和Cd)的沉积物质量基准值分别为145.2,308.72,293.01,0.46mg/kg.以此CSQC为参比值,参考潜在生态危害指数法对各元素赋予不同的权重值,运用综合污染指数法对太湖沉积物重金属的环境质量进行评价,结果显示,2010年8~9月太湖沉积物质量基本为良.这一结果与沉积物重金属总量分析结果一致. The equilibrium partitioning(EqP) approach was used to preliminarily discuss the sediment quality criteria(SQC) recommended values of four heavy metals-cadmium(Cd),copper(Cu),lead(Pb),and zinc(Zn) for surface sediments from Taihu Lake.The SQCs for the heavy metals were calculated using the US EPA fresh quality criteria,which were based on aquatic toxicity of the final chronic level of heavy metals.The calculated SQCs of Cu,Pb,Zn and Cd of the Taihu Lake were 145.2,308.72,293.01 and 0.46mg/kg.Taking this SQC as reference value,endowing these elements with different weights by referring to the potential ecological risk index approach and using complex pollution indices method,a new approach of quality assessment on heavy metals in surface sediments was developed,which was also applied to evaluate environmental quality of heavy metals in sediment of the Taihu Lake.Sediment quality of the whole Taihu Lake were primarily in "good" level based on the sample analysis(2010-8,9).The results were coherence with the analysis of total heavy metals.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期1860-1866,共7页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家水体污染与控制重大专项(2009ZX07528-002,2012ZX07503-002)
关键词 太湖 重金属污染 相平衡法 沉积物质量评价 Taihu Lake heavy metal pollution the equilibrium partitioning(EqP) approach sediment quality assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Chapman P M. Current approaches to developing sediment quality criteria [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1989,8(7):589-599.
  • 2Procedures for derivation of equilibrium partitioning sediment benchmarks (ECBs) for protection of benthic organisms: PAH mixtures [R]. EPA26002R2022013. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development, EPA, 2003.
  • 3Di Toro D M, MeGrath J A. Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. [[. Mixtures and sediments [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000, 19:1971-1982.
  • 4陈云增,杨浩,张振克,秦明周.淡水沉积物环境质量基准差异分析[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(3):193-201. 被引量:29
  • 5Long E R, Morgan L G. The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the national status and trends program. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum [R]. NOS OMA 52. Seattle, Washington, 1990.
  • 6Pavlou S P,Weaton D P. Initial evaluation of alternatives for development of sediment related criteria for toxic contaminants in marine water puget sound-phase 2: development and test of the sediment-water equilibrium portioning approaches [R]. Prepared for USEPA, 1984.
  • 7William J Adams, Richard A Kimerle, James W Barnett Jr. Sediment quality and aquatic life assessment [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1992,26(10): 1864-1875.
  • 8陈静生,王飞越.关于水体沉积物质量基准问题[J].环境化学,1992,11(3):60-70. 被引量:39
  • 9谢红彬,陈雯.太湖流域制造业结构变化对水环境演变的影响分析——以苏锡常地区为例[J].湖泊科学,2002,14(1):53-59. 被引量:62
  • 10Rauret G F, Lopez-Sanchez J, Sahuquillo A, et al. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials [J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 1999,1(1):57-61.

二级参考文献72

共引文献187

同被引文献308

引证文献17

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部