摘要
目的:探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术方式在胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补中的优缺点,并比较二者的疗效差异。方法:选取78例胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔患者,将其随机分为腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组,各39例,对两组术中出血量、手术时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、切口感染、住院时间等情况进行比较。结果:腹腔镜手术组患者术中出血量、手术时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、切口感染率、住院时间方面优于开腹手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下行胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的疗效确切,具有出血少、手术时间短、术后恢复快、切口感染率低等优点,且安全可靠,可在临床大力推广。
Objective ：To compare the clinical effect of laparoseopy and laparotomy on gastroduodenal ulcer perforation neoplasty.Methods ：78 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation were divided randomly into laparoscopy group（39 cases）and laparotomy group（39 cases）, and to compare the clinical effect of two groups including blood loss, operation time, time of resuming peristaltic sound, wound infection and hospital stay.Results ：The outcome of blood loss, operation time, time of resuming peristaltic sound, wound infection and hospital stay in laparoscopy group were significantly lower than that of laparotomy group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion ：The clinical effect of laparoscopy on gastroduodenal ulcer perforation is less bleeding, short operation time, short recovery time and low wound infection rate, it is safe and superior to that of laparotomy.Therefore, it is worth popularizing,
出处
《中外医学研究》
2012年第25期15-16,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
腹腔镜
开腹
胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔
修补术
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Gastroduodenal ulcer perforation
Neoplasty
