期刊文献+

基于秩依期望效用理论的鹰鸽博弈均衡解分析 被引量:24

Nash equilibrium of hawk-dove game based on rank-dependent expected utility theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用秩依期望效用理论研究鹰鸽博弈模型,在考虑局中人带有情绪因素的条件下研究博弈均衡解的存在性条件以及局中人情绪因素对均衡解的影响规律.研究发现:局中人情绪因素虽然不影响纯战略意义下的博弈均衡解,但对混合战略纳什均衡解存在非常大的影响.如果博弈双方争夺的利益大于双方同时采取"鹰"策略时的总成本,则无论局中人情绪如何,博弈不存在混合战略均衡;如果博弈双方争夺的利益小于双方同时采取"鹰"策略时的总成本,则当局中人同为悲观情绪且情绪指数的倒数之和小于等于1时,博弈不存在混合战略均衡解;否则,混合战略均衡解存在.特别地,如果博弈双方争夺的利益等于双方同时采取"鹰"策略时的总成本,则无论局中人情绪如何,存在且有无数个混合战略均衡.此外,在混合战略均衡存在的条件下,各自的混合均衡战略是分别关于自身或对方情绪指数的单调函数. A hawk-dove RDEU-game model has been established based on the rank-dependent utility theory in this paper. It is found that: Although the players' emotional factors do not affect the pure strategy equilibri- um, they do affect the existence of mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. If the total interest when both sides scrab- ble is more than the total cost when both adopt the "hawk" strategy, the game mixed strategy equilibrium does not exist whatever the emotions of the players; If the total interests, when both sides scrabble is less than the total cost when they adopt the "hawk" strategy, or both players are pessimism and the sum of the reciprocal of their sentiment index is less than or equal to 1, the game does not exist mixed strategy equilibrium, either; Otherwise, mixed strategy equilibrium exists. In particular, If the total interests when both sides scrabble is e- qual to the total cost after they adopt the " hawk" strategy, there exist numerous mixed strategy equilibrium whatever the players' emotions arc. In addition, in mixed strategy equilibrium, their mixed strategy equilibri- um all are monotonous functions of their own or the other's sentiment index, respectively.
作者 龚日朝
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期35-45,共11页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BTJ012) 教育部人文社科规划基金资助项目(07JA790084) 湖南省科技计划重点资助项目(2008ZK2002) 湖南省社会科学基金资助项目(08YBB278) 湖南省高校科技创新团队支持计划资助项目
关键词 秩依期望效用 鹰鸽博弈 情绪函数 rank-dependent utility hawk-dove game emotional function
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Crowley P H. Hawks ,doves and mixed-symmetry games[ J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2000, 204(4) : 543 -563.
  • 2Smith J M, Price G R. The logic of animal conflictc[J]. Nature, 1973, 246(02) : 15 - 18.
  • 3Cressman R. The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory: A Dynamic Approach[ M ]. Berlin Heidelbergy: Springer- Verlag Press. 1992.
  • 4王斌,徐寅峰,孙利辉.“鹰鸽博弈”的量子分析[J].系统工程,2004,22(10):1-4. 被引量:12
  • 5刘伟兵,王先甲.基于PSO神经网络的进化博弈研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(8):1282-1284. 被引量:7
  • 6Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior [ M ]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.
  • 7i Machina M J. Expected utility theory without the independent axiom[ J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50( 1 ) : 277 -323.
  • 8Machina M J. Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved[ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1987, 1 (1): 121-154.
  • 9] Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility[ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, 3 (4) : 323 -343.
  • 10熊国强,陈爱娟.鹰鸽博弈问题新解——非期望效用理论下的博弈模型及其均衡分析[J].经济评论,2009(1):128-132. 被引量:5

二级参考文献33

  • 1王斌,徐寅峰,孙利辉.“鹰鸽博弈”的量子分析[J].系统工程,2004,22(10):1-4. 被引量:12
  • 2肖条军:《博弈论及其应用》,上海,上海三联书店,2005.
  • 3Cressman, R., 1992. The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory: A Dynamic Approach. Berlin Heidelbergy, Springer - Vedag Press.
  • 4Crowley, P. H., 2000. "Hawks, Doves, and Mixed - symmetry Games." Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 204, pp. 543 - 563.
  • 5Hammerstein. P. and Parker, G. A., 1982. "The Asymmetric War of Attrition." Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 96, pp. 6,47 - 682.
  • 6Levy, H., 1998. Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishes.
  • 7Machina, M. J., 1982. "Expected Utility Theory without the Independent Axiom." Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 277 - 323.
  • 8Machina, M. J., 1987. “Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, pp. 121 - 154.
  • 9Matsumura, S. and Kobayashi, T., 1998. "A Game Model for Dominance Relations among Group - living Animals." Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, Vol. 42, pp. 77 - 84.
  • 10Maynard, Smith and Price, G. R., 1973. "The Logic of Animal Conflict." Nature, Vol. 246, pp. 15 - 18.

共引文献20

同被引文献282

引证文献24

二级引证文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部