摘要
目的探讨相对参照点头位照相法和骨科量角器法在临床测量代偿头位角度的应用，并比较两种方法的特点。方法随机数字表法选择2011年3至4月及8至9月于天津市眼科医院住院治疗的有代偿头位患者30例，分别采用头位照相法和骨科量角器法先后测量患者头位在3个轴向（矢状轴、垂直轴、水平轴）扭转的角度。采用配对t检验统计方法比较两种方法测量的结果。结果头位照相法测量代偿头位扭转角为15．62°±7．48°；骨科量角器法测量代偿头位扭转角为15．50°±6．99°，两种方法测量结果之间积矩相关系数r=0．955（P〈0．01），差异无统计学意义（t=0．286，P=0．777）。结论相对参照点头位照相法和骨科量角器法操作简便，是适合临床应用的测量代偿头位的方法。两种方法测量代偿头位扭转角度结果一致性好。
Objective To evaluate the application of relative reference point photographic analysis method and goniometer method for head posture measurement, and compare the characteristics of the two methods. Methods Thirty patients from March 2011 to April 2011 and August to September with AHP in our hospital were recruited. The AHP were measured by photographic analysis and goniometer method respectively. The data were analyzed by SPSS software. Results The mean AHP was 15.62°± 7.48° by photographic analysis measurement, 15.50°± 6. 99° by goniometer measurement. The Pearson＇s correlation coefficient（ r = 0. 955, P 〈 0. 001, t = 0. 286, P = 0. 777 ） . Conclusions Relative reference point photographic analysis is a simple and effective way to measure AHP. The results measured by the two methods are highly consistent.
出处
《中华眼科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第9期789-793,共5页
Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金
天津市卫生局科技基金项目（2011ky33）
关键词
体位
摄影术
斜视
诊断技术
眼科
Posture
Photography
Strabismus
Diagnostic techniques,ophthalmological
