期刊文献+

走向主体间性的虚构诗学——伊瑟尔文论思想的文化诗学转向 被引量:1

Wolfgang Iser:towards Fictive Poetics of Inter-subjectivity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在主体间性的交往视阈下,对伊瑟尔的文论思想"重新语境化",能够更好地勘定其多维面向及历史延展。伊瑟尔前期的效应美学仍然存在着本质主义的思维倾向,主要表现在确定性/不确定交流观的二分误区,阅读理论的非历史性倾向,以及欠缺审美同情向度的探讨。缘此晚期的伊瑟尔在与后现代理论家的对话与论争中,立足于现代与后现代相互碰撞与交融的文化语境,从文学理论批评转入文化诗学研究,由微观角度的分析演化为宏观整体把握,进而实现主体间性的文学人类学转向。 On the horizon of inter-subjectivity communication, the multi-dimensional and Iser's thought of literary theory should be better investigated with re-contextualization. The history ferment of thinking way of essentialism still existed in effective aesthetics of early Iser, such as the dichotomy of determinacy and indeterminacy, the tendency of non historicity, and the lack of aesthetic sympathy. As a result, with the dialog with the postmodernists, on the context of the conflict and integration of modernity and post-modernity, Iser adjusted his theory from literary theory to cultural studies, from microscopic analysis to macroscopic studies, and finaily moved towards literary anthropology of inter-subjectivity.
作者 王伟
出处 《厦门理工学院学报》 2012年第3期107-111,共5页 Journal of Xiamen University of Technology
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC760128) 福建省教育厅社会科学研究项目(JA12229S)
关键词 伊瑟尔文论思想 主体间性 虚构诗学 本质主义 literary theory of Iser inter-subjectivity Fictive Poetics essentialism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献30

  • 1周启超.理念上的“对接”与视界上的“超越”——什克洛夫斯基与穆卡若夫斯基的文论之比较[J].外国文学评论,2005(4):28-37. 被引量:2
  • 2陆扬.电视与大众文化[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,28(1):35-38. 被引量:3
  • 3Fluck, Winfried. “The Search for Distance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory.” New Literary History 31.1 (Winter 2000) : 178-80
  • 4Goldstein, Philip & James L. Machor eds. New Directions in American Reception Study. Oxford & New York: Oxford UP, 2008.
  • 5Leitch, Vincent, ed. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001.
  • 6Winfried Fluck, “The Searchfor Distance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory,” New Literary History 31.1 (Winter 2000) : 178-80.
  • 7Wolfgang Iser, “Reader Response Criticismin Perspective,” Changes and Challenges : The Role of the Future University , ( Seoul : Hanyang UP, 1990).
  • 8Terry Eagleton, After Theory (NewYork: Basic Books, 2003) 38, 53.
  • 9Wolfgang Iser, “Reader Re-sponse Criticism in Perspective,” Changes and Challenges: The Role of the Future.
  • 10David H. Hiesch, The Deconstruction of Literature, Criticism after Auschwitz (Hanover & London: Brown UP, 1991 ) 143-45.

共引文献34

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部