期刊文献+

英语作格动词一价和二价语义解读

On Semantic Interpretation of English Ergative Verbs:Mono-valent and Bivalent
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语作格动词是词汇语义范畴内讨论的热点问题,有特殊的语义表征。按照词汇性质,作格动词是具有较强动作意义的使役动词,使役性诱因既可以是外来的、也可以是内在的,形成其客体既能出现在主位上,又能出现在宾位上的及物和不及物两种句式。基于此,作格动词在词库中被分为一价和二价两个次类。通过比较它们的词汇语义表征,从而认定致使义和及物性是作格动词一价和二价存在的词汇语义基础。 The English ergative verbs are issues of the lexical semantic category with special semantic representation. According to their lexical characters, the ergative verbs belong to the causative verbs with the strong action meaning. Their causative factors can be external and internal as well, which will lead to two sentence patterns with their theme in the subjector the object position of transitivity and intransitivity. Based on this, the ergative verbs in the lexicon can be divided into two subcategories: mono-valent and bivalent. By comparing their lexical semantic representation, the paper bases the lexical semantics of the ergative verbs-mono-valent and bivalent on the causative meaning and transitivity.
作者 程文华
出处 《合肥学院学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第5期119-123,共5页 Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences
基金 安徽建筑工业学院校级教学研究项目"外语课堂环境下学生词汇能力的发展研究"(2011YX23)的阶段性成果
关键词 作格动词 一价和二价 致使义 及物性 ergative verb mono-valent and bivalent verb causative meaning transitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Levin B, Rappaport M. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax- Lexical Semantic. Interface [ M ]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995:79.
  • 2Sinclair J. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary [ M]. London and Glassgow: Collins, 1987 : 1620.
  • 3顾阳.生成语法及词库中动词的一些特性[J].当代语言学,1996(3):1-16. 被引量:92
  • 4Zobl H. Canonical Typological Structures and Ergativity in English L2 Acquisition [ M ] //Gass S M, Schachter J. Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1989:203-221.
  • 5Radford A. Transformational Grammar [M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press ,1988:374-446.
  • 6Lyons J. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1968:352.
  • 7Haspelmath M. More on the Typology of Inehoative/ Causative Verb Alternations [ M ]. Comrie B, Polinsky M. Causatives and Transitivity. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 1993 : 87-120.
  • 8Saeed J I. Semantics [ M ].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,1997:73.
  • 9Lakoff George. Linguistic Gestalts [ M ]//Papers from the 13^th Regional Meetings. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1977 : 236-287.
  • 10Keyser S, Roeper T. On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English [ J ]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1984 (15) :381-416.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Chomsky Noam.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,1965.
  • 2Jackendoff R.Semantic Structures,1990.
  • 3Jackendoff R.Semantics and Cognition,1983.
  • 4Chomsky N.Some notes on economy of derivation and representation,1991.
  • 5Vendler Zeno.Linguistics in Philosophy,1967.
  • 6Chomsky N.Bare phrase structure,1995.
  • 7Chomsky,Noam;Morris Halle.The Sound Pattern of English,1968.
  • 8Talmy L.Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition,1988(02).
  • 9Chomsky,N.Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin and use,1986.
  • 10Marantz,A.On the Nature of Grammatical Relations,1984.

共引文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部