期刊文献+

不同煤燃烧过程颗粒汞生成特性的实验研究 被引量:7

Formation characteristics of Hg particulates during combustion of different coals
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在高温管式电加热炉上进行了三种煤单独燃烧,三种煤添加1%、3%、5%溴化钙与醋酸钙燃烧,以及一种煤添加Fe2O3燃烧实验,燃烧温度为1250℃。收集了各燃烧过程的飞灰,对收集的飞灰进行了Hg含量测定,并对飞灰进行了比表面积、EDS与XRD表征。实验与分析结果表明,三种煤燃烧后Hgp的生成特性显著不同;三号煤灰的比表面积最大但飞灰颗粒Hg含量及Hgp比率均很低;在添加CaBr2后,三种煤飞灰颗粒Hg含量及Hgp比率均显著增加;在三种煤中添加醋酸钙,及在三号煤中添加Fe2O3后,Hgp含量与比率有所增加,但增加幅度较小。 Combustion experiments(3 coals,3 coals with addition of 1%,3%,5% CaBr2 and Ca(CH3COO)2,and a coal with addition of Fe2O3) were conducted on a high temperature electric heating reactor at 1 250 ℃.The fly ashes were collected and the particulate Hg(Hgp) contents were analyzed.The specific surface area,EDS,and XRD analysis were performed.It is indicated that the Hgp formations characteristics of the 3 coals were rather different.The ash of coal 3 has the largest specific surface area,but the lowest Hg content and Hgp ratio in its ash.CaBr2 addition leads to significant increment of Hg content in ash and Hgp ratio.Ca(H3COO)2 and Fe2O3 addition do not lead to prominent increase of Hgp.
出处 《燃料化学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1135-1141,共7页 Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology
基金 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金 华北电力大学校内科研基金(200913003)
关键词 溴化钙 颗粒汞 煤燃烧 CaBr2; Hgp; coal combustion
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1SRIVASTAVA R, HUTSON N, MARTIN B, PRINCIOTI'A F, STAUDT J. Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers: An overview of the status of mercury control technologies [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40 (5) : 1385-1393.
  • 2YUDOVICH Y E, KETRIS M P. Mercury in coal: A review Part 2. Coal use and environmental problem[ J ]. Int J Coal Geol, 2005,62 (3) : 135-165.
  • 3PAVLISH J H, SONDREAL E A, MANN M D, OLSON E S, GALBREATH K C, LAUDAL D L, BENSON S A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plant [ J ]. Fuel Process Technol, 2003, 82 (2/3) : 89-165.
  • 4h'ILCOX J, RUPP E, YING S-C, LIM D-H, NEGREIRA A S, KIRCHOFER A, FENG F, LEE K. Mercury adsorption and oxidation in coal :ombustion and gasification processes [J]. Int J Coal Geol, 2012, 90/91: 4-20.
  • 5PUDASAINEE D, KIM J-H, YOON Y-S, SEO Y-C. Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal fired power plants with SCR, CS ESP and wet FGD[J]. Fuel, 2012, 93(3) : 312-318.
  • 6ABAD-VALLE P, LOPEZ-ANTON M A, DIAZ-SOMOANO M, MART1NEZ-TARAZONA M R. The role of unburned carbon concentrates from fly ashes in the oxidation and retention of mercury[ J]. Chem Eng J, 2011, 174( 1 ) : 86-92.
  • 7PAVLISH J H, HAMRE L L, ZHUANG Y. Mercury cona'ol technologies for coal combustion and gasification systems [J]. Fuel, 2010, 89 (4) : 838-847.
  • 8ANTONIA LOPEZ-ANTON M, ABAD-VALLE P, DLeuZ-SOMOANO M, SUAREZ-RUIZ I, ROSA MARTEZ-TARAZONA M. The influence of carbon particle type in fly ashes on mercury adsorption [ J ]. Fuel, 2009, 88 (7) : 1194-1200.
  • 9KOSTOVA I J, HOWER J C, MASTALERZ M, VASSILEV S V. Mercury capture by selected Bulgarian fly ashes: Influence of coal rank and fly ash carbon pore structure on capture efficiency[ J]. Appl Geochem, 2011, 26( 1 ) : 18-27.
  • 10HUGHES K J, MA L, PORTER R T J, POURKASHANIAN M. Mercury transformation modelling with bromine addition in coal derived flue gases[J]. Comp Aided Chem Eng, 2011, 29(1) : 171-175.

同被引文献135

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部