摘要
文章以"刺破公司面纱"案件为例,阐述了仲裁第三人存在的合理性和必要性,即一方面其并不违背仲裁的意思自治原则,而是在对当事人意思自治限缩条件下对意思自治的真正实现,是仲裁的价值目标所向;另一方面目前我国的法律并不能在仲裁第三人之外提供有效的替代性措施。
Taking the ＂piercing the corporate veil case＂ as an example,the article points out the rationality and necessity of the existence of the third person of the arbitration.That is on one hand,it does not violate the principle of autonomy principle of arbitration,but realizes the autonomy under the narrow conditions of party autonomy and is the value targets to arbitration.On the other hand,our laws cannot provide effective alternative measures outside the third person of the arbitration at present.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2012年第3期127-129,共3页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
公司面纱
仲裁第三人
意思自治
corporate veil
the third person of the arbitration
autonomy
