期刊文献+

利用分析性能σ值、不精密度及分析总误差评价相同项目使用不同参考区间检测系统的分析性能 被引量:7

Performance evaluation of detection systems with different reference intervals of the same project by analyzing performance value of σ,imprecision and analytical total error
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的利用分析性能西格玛(σ)值、不精密度及分析总误差,评价相同项目使用不同参考区间的检测系统分析性能或评估检测系统分析性能的衰减。方法收集2011年实验室干、湿化学分析系统室内质控及室间质评项目的部分数据,依据美国临床实验室改进修正法案(CLIA′88)的允许总误差(TE),应用公式分析性能σ=[允许总误差(TE)-Bias(%)]/CV计算σ值,同时使用TE=|Bias|+Z×CV(%)计算项目的分析总误差,统计分析不精密度(CV),进行质量控制方案的选择和质量改进,评价两种分析系统的分析性能。结果统计15项检测项目,干、湿化学两种分析系统的分析总误差,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不精密度干化学分析系统(x,3.63%)好于湿化学分析系统(x,2.42%),P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;分析性能σ值,干化学分析系统(x,5.16;σ>4为10项,占66.7%)好于湿化学分析系统(x,3.40;σ>4为3项,占20%),P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论该室干化学分析系统的分析性能稍好于湿化学分析系统。6σ质量管理方式不仅是实验室进行质量管理的重要工具,其分析性能σ值与不精密度、分析总误差共同在评价同一实验室相同项目使用不同参考区间的检测系统或评估检测系统分析性能的衰减方面具有重要的参考价值。 Objective To evaluate the performance of different detection systems with different reference intervals for the same item or to evaluate the attenuation of performance of detection systems by using analytical performance of Sigma(σ) values,imprecision and analytical total error.Methods Partial data of internal quality control and external quality assessment of dry and wet chemical analyzing systems in 2011 were collected.According to allowed total error(TE) claimed by the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments Act(CLIA’88),the performance value of σwas calculated with formula of σ=(TE-Bias%)/CV.The total error was calculated with formula of TE=|Bias|+Z×CV(%).Analysis imprecision(CV) was statistically analyzed.Quality control program was selected to amend quality.The analytical performance of the two analysis systems was evaluated.Results 15 test items,detected by the two kinds chemical analyzing systems,were with no statistical difference of total error(P〉0.05).Imprecision of dry chemical system(x=3.63%) was better than wet chemical system(x=2.42%),P〈0.05.Mean value of performance value of σ about dry chemical system was 5.16,with 10 items(66.7%) σ〉4,which was better than wet chemical system[x=3.40,with 3 items(20.0%)σ〉4],P〈0.05.Conclusion Dry chemical system in this laboratory might be with better analytical performance than wet chemical system.6σ quality management could not only be an important tool for laboratory quality management,but also be with important reference value for evaluating the performance of different detection systems with different reference intervals for the same item and the attenuation of performance of detection systems,when combined with imprecision and total error.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第13期1561-1564,共4页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 分析性能西格玛 不精密度 总误差 检测系统 analyze the performance of sigma; imprecision; total error; detection system
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘小娟,黄亨建,李萍,徐克和,余霆,胥劲,叶艾竹,吴士吉.罗氏生化试剂用于奥林巴斯全自动生化分析仪的溯源性分析[J].华西医学,2004,19(3):401-402. 被引量:16
  • 2莫凡,黄与双,赵洁,肖桂初.6σ质量标准在血细胞分析中的应用研究[J].国际检验医学杂志,2007,28(1):14-16. 被引量:4
  • 3李园园,李萍,黄亨建.应用六西格玛理论评价临床实验室检验性能及设计质控方案[J].中国医疗器械信息,2007,13(6):9-11. 被引量:36
  • 4Westgard JO. Six sigma table EOL/S]. http://www.westgard.con./sixsigmatable.html.2007.
  • 5刘忠民 高月亭 陈涛 等.应用操作过程规范图评价和设计室内质量控制方法.医学实验室与临床,2007,14(4):17-20.
  • 6Nevalainen D,Berte L,Kraft C,et al.Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2000,124(4),516-519.
  • 7Westgard JO.Six Sigma Quality Design and Control[M].2nd ed.Madison:Westgard QC2006:157-184.
  • 8Westgard JO,Westgard SA.The quality of laboratory testing today:an assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for accep table performance[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2006,125(3):343-354.
  • 9Coskun A.Six sand calculated laboratory tests[J].Clin Chem,2006,52(4):770-771.
  • 10Alexander Bragat.Westgard QC A Six Sigma Method Decision Chart spreadsheet.www.westgard.com.

共引文献129

同被引文献50

  • 1焦连亭.我国生化分析仪临床应用中应注意的若干问题[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(5):472-474. 被引量:38
  • 2储海,皇甫月明.浅谈全自动生化分析仪的校准体会[J].医疗装备,2005,18(8):58-58. 被引量:7
  • 3Sands VM, Auerbach PS.Birnbaum J,et ai. Evaluation of a porta-ble clinical blood analyzer in the emergency department[J]. AcadEmerg Med,1995,2(3) :172-178.
  • 4Nevalainen D. Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory per-formance On quality indicators with the six sigmascale[J]. ArchPathol Lab Med,2000,124(4) :516-519.
  • 5David M,Parry ST. The quality goal index-its use in benchmark-ing and improving sigma quality performance of automated analyt-ic test[OL/S]. http://westgard. com/vip34. html[2006].
  • 6Westgard JO .Westgard SA . The quality of laboratory testing to-day; an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using per-formance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA cri-teria for acceptable performance[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006,125(3):343-354.
  • 7Singh B, Goswami B,Gupta VK, et al. Application of sigma met-rics for the assessment of quality assurance in clinical biochemistrylaboratory in India: a pilo study[J]. Indian J Clin Biochem* 2011,26(2):131-135.
  • 8中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-CL02医学实验室质量与能力认可准则(ISO15189:2007)[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2008.
  • 9中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNASCL02医学实验室质量与能力认可准则(ISO15189:2012,IDT)[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2013.
  • 10中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-TRL-001CNAS技术报告:医学实验室--不确定度的评定与表达[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2012.

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部