期刊文献+

21世纪的室内空气品质:追求优异 被引量:32

IAQ in the 21st century: search for excellence
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 现场研究表明 ,即使在许多符合现行标准和指南的建筑物中 ,也有相当多数的人对室内空气品质不满意 ,甚至出现病态建筑综合症的症状。其原因在于上述标准规定的要求过低 ,使得很多人不满意并受到不良影响。预见在 2 1世纪将发生从中等到优异的室内环境的范式转变。提出下述 5项原理作为优异准则的基本要素 :改善室内空气品质将提高生产率减少病态建筑综合症症状 ;应排除不必要的室内污染源 ;应为室内人员提供干爽的送风 ;应实行“个性化送风” ,即以少量洁净空气和缓地送到每个人的呼吸区附近 ; Field studies demonstrate that there are substantial numbers of dissatisfied people in many buildings, among them those suffering from sick buiding syndrome(SBS) symptoms, even though existing standards and guideline are met. The reason is that the requirements specified in these standards are rather low, allowing a substantial group of people to become dissatisfied and to be adversely affected. A paradigm shift from rather mediocre to excellent indoor environments is foreseen in the 21st century. Based on existing information and new research results, five principles are suggested as elements behind a new philosophy of excellence: better in door air quality increases productivity and decreases SBS syndrome; unnecessary indoor pollution sources should be avoided; the air should be served cool and dry to the occupants; “personalized air”, i.e.a small amount of clean air, should be served gently, close to the breathing zone of each individual; individual control of the thermal environment should be provided. These principles of excellence are compatible with energy efficiency and sustainability.
出处 《暖通空调》 北大核心 2000年第3期32-35,共4页 Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning
关键词 生产率 污染源控制 个性化送风 室内空气品质 productivity, pollution source control, enthalpy, personalized air, individual thermal control
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 11,ASHRAE Standard 62-1999. Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta, GA, American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers,1999.
  • 22,CEN. Ventilation for buildings: design criteria for the indoor environment. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization(CR 1752), 1998.
  • 33,ECA(European Concerted Action “Indoor air quality and its impact on man”). Guidelines for ventilation requirements in buildings.Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities(Report No.11,EUR 14449EN), 1992.
  • 44,Fisk W J, Mendell M J, Daisey J M, et al. The California healthy building study, Phase 1: a summary. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air'93, 1993, Vol.1,279-284.
  • 55,Mendell M J. Non-specific symptoms in office workers: a review and summary of the epidemiologic literature. Indoor Air, 1993,(3):227-236.
  • 66,Sundell J. On the association between building ventilation characteristics, some indoor environmental exposures, some allergic manifestations and subjective symptom reports. Indoor Air, 1994,Supplement No.2.
  • 77,Bluyssen P M, de Oliveira Fernandes E, Groes L, et al.European indoor air quality audit project in 56 office buildings. Indoor Air, 1996,(6):221-238.
  • 88,Wargocki P, Wyon D P, Baik Y K, et al. Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome(SBS)symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. Indoor Air, 1999,9(3):165-179.
  • 99,Fisk W J, Rosenfeld A H. Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor Air, 1997, (7): 158-172[Errata in Indoor Air,1998,(8):301].
  • 1010,Seppnen O. Estimated cost of indoor climate in Finnish buildings. In: Prcoeedings of Indoor Air '99, 1999, Edinburgh, Vol 4:13-18.

同被引文献261

引证文献32

二级引证文献817

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部