期刊文献+

Current knowledge on esophageal atresia 被引量:40

Current knowledge on esophageal atresia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 Esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is the most common congenital anomaly of the esophagus. The improvement of survival observed over the previous two decades is multifactorial and largely attributable to advances in neonatal intensive care, neonatal anesthesia, ventilatory and nutritional support, antibiotics, early surgical intervention, surgical materials and techniques. Indeed, mortality is currently limited to those cases with coexisting severe life-threatening anomalies. The diagnosis of EA is most commonly made during the first 24 h of life but may occur either antenatally or may be delayed. The primary surgical correction for EA and TEF is the best option in the absence of severe malformations. There is no ideal replacement for the esophagus and the optimal surgical treatment for patients with long-gap EA is still contro-versial. The primary complications during the postoperative period are leak and stenosis of the anastomosis, gastro-esophageal reflux, esophageal dysmotility, fistula recurrence, respiratory disorders and deformities of the thoracic wall. Data regarding long-term outcomes and follow-ups are limited for patients following EA/TEF repair. The determination of the risk factors for the complicated evolution following EA/TEF repair may positively impact long-term prognoses. Much remains to be studied regarding this condition. This manuscript provides a literature review of the current knowledge regarding EA. Esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is the most common congenital anomaly of the esophagus. The improvement of survival observed over the previous two decades is multifactorial and largely attributable to advances in neonatal intensive care, neonatal anesthesia, ventilatory and nutritional support, antibiotics, early surgical intervention, surgical materials and techniques. Indeed, mortality is currently limited to those cases with coexisting severe life-threatening anomalies. The diagnosis of EA is most commonly made during the first 24 h of life but may occur either antenatally or may be delayed. The primary surgical correction for EA and TEF is the best option in the absence of severe malformations. There is no ideal replacement for the esophagus and the optimal surgical treatment for patients with long-gap EA is still contro-versial. The primary complications during the postoperative period are leak and stenosis of the anastomosis, gastro-esophageal reflux, esophageal dysmotility, fistula recurrence, respiratory disorders and deformities of the thoracic wall. Data regarding long-term outcomes and follow-ups are limited for patients following EA/TEF repair. The determination of the risk factors for the complicated evolution following EA/TEF repair may positively impact long-term prognoses. Much remains to be studied regarding this condition. This manuscript provides a literature review of the current knowledge regarding EA.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第28期3662-3672,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Fundao de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Brazil Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil FAPEMIG: CBB-APQ-00075-09/ CNPq 573646/2008-2 Programa de Grupos de ExcelênciaFINEP, Brazil
关键词 Esophageal atresia Tracheoesophageal fistula Esophageal stenosis Long-gap Gastro-esophageal reflux 食管 知识 闭锁 手术治疗 呼吸系统疾病 重症监护 营养支持 功能障碍
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1Richter JE. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the older patient: presentation, treatment, and complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:368-373.
  • 2Long JD, Orlando RC. Nonerosive reflux disease. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2007; 53:127-141.
  • 3Singh P, Adamopoulos A, Taylor RH, Colin-Jones DG. Oesophageal motor function before and after healing of oesophagitis. Gut 1992; 33:1590-1596.
  • 4Lin S, Ke M, Xu J, Kahrilas PJ. Impaired esophageal emptying in reflux disease. Am J Gastroentero11994; 89:1003-1006.
  • 5Ho SC, Chang CS, Wu CY, Chen GH. Ineffective esophageal motility is a primary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47:652-656.
  • 6Leite LP, Johnston BT, Barrett J, Castell JA, Castell DO. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Dig Dis Sci 1997; 42:1859-1865.
  • 7Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, Lundell L, Margulies M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996; 111:85-92.
  • 8Spechler SJ,Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 2001; 49:145-151.
  • 9McCollough M, Jabbar A, Cacchione R, Alien JW, Harrell S, Wo JM. Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate. Dig Dis Sci 2004; 49:1607-1611.
  • 10Hirano I, Richter JE. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol2007; 102:668-685.

共引文献8

同被引文献183

引证文献40

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部