摘要
通过CSSCI数据库2005-2011年的引文数据,对15种图书情报类核心期刊g指数与期刊发文数量、被引用论文数量、h指数逐一比较,分析各评价指标的特点及其评价结果产生差异的原因。提出了剔除期刊发文数量影响的新期刊评价指标——相对g指数,对相对g指数和g指数进行了对比,认为相对g指数在期刊评价中更具有科学性与客观性。
Through the quotation data in CSSCI from 2005 to 2011, the g- index, the number of published articles, the number of cited papers and h- index of 15 kinds of core LIS journals are compared one by one. The features of each evaluation index are analyzed as well as the reasons of different evaluation results. The new journal evaluation index eliminating the influence of the number of the journal published pape, relative g- index is proposed. The relative g- index is compared with g- index, and results show that the g- index is more scientific and objective in periodical evaluations.
出处
《现代情报》
CSSCI
2012年第8期101-105,共5页
Journal of Modern Information
