期刊文献+

超声造影结合Bosniak标准在良恶性肾囊性病变鉴别诊断中的价值 被引量:9

Value of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography Combined with Bosniak System in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价超声造影鉴别良恶性肾囊性病变的准确性,探讨超声造影结合Bosniak标准分级诊断肾囊性病变的可行性。资料与方法对30例患者的36个肾囊性病灶进行超声造影,分析良恶性肾囊性病变的超声造影征象;按照Bosniak标准对超声造影的表现进行分级诊断,计算其敏感性、特异性、诊断符合率、阳性预测值、阳性似然比、Kappa值及验后概率,分析该方法分级诊断肾囊性病变的准确性。结果超声造影可显示常规超声不能发现的囊内分隔及实性结构。超声造影结合Bosniak标准诊断肾囊性病变的敏感性、特异性、诊断符合率、阳性预测值、阳性似然比分别为92.9%、90.9%、94.8%、86.7%、10.2,Kappa=0.83;应用超声造影结合Bosniak标准可提高肾囊性病变良恶性诊断的验后概率。结论超声造影结合Bosniak标准可以提高鉴别诊断肾囊性病变良恶性的准确性。 Purpose To evaluate contrast enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) in differential diagnosing renal cystic lesions,and identify the diagnosis classification of renal cystic lesions with Bosniak.Materials and Methods Thirty patients with 36 renal cystic masses were detected with CEUS.All masses were graded according to features of CEUS with Bosniak criteria.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,positive likelihood ratio,Kappa value and posterior probability were calculated.This method was testified the authenticity and reliability.Results CEUSshowed more separated and solid structure in renal cystic mass than conventional ultrasound.CEUS combined with Bosniak system had a sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,positive likelihood ratio of 92.9%,90.9%,94.8%,86.7%,10.2,Kappa value was 0.83.CEUS combined with Bosniak classification improved the posterior probability of differential diagnosis in renal cystic mass.Conclusion CEUS with Bosniak classification can improve the diagnosis accuracy in benign and malignant renal cyst mass.
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期536-539,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2011211B36)
关键词 肾疾病 囊性 肾肿瘤 超声造影 BOSNIAK分级 诊断 鉴别 Kidney diseases cystic Kidney neoplasms Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Bosniak classification Diagnosis differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Humke U, et al. Differential diagnosis of focal lesions of the kidney in CT and MRT. Rontgenpraxis, 2008, 56(6): 219-240.
  • 2Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology, 1986, 158(1): 1-10.
  • 3熊永红,陈孝岳,王悦.囊性肾癌的影像学诊断[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(10):1370-1371. 被引量:12
  • 4徐建红,文兴跃,李俊来,唐杰.小肾癌的彩色多普勒超声诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2009,17(4):255-257. 被引量:12
  • 5王金锐,苗立英,崔立刚,杨敬英,王淑敏,刘国辉.超声造影在囊性肾病变中的应用价值[J].中国医学科学院学报,2008,30(1):22-26. 被引量:11
  • 6蒋珺,陈亚青,朱云开,周永昌.超声造影结合Bosniak分级诊断囊性肾癌的可行性[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(3):549-552. 被引量:17
  • 7Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, et al. Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced US. Radiology, 2007, 243(1): 158-165.
  • 8Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH, et al. Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 61 (2): 310-314.
  • 9Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. Am J Roentgenol, 2008,191(4): 1239-1249.
  • 10Ignee A, Straub B, Brix D, et al. The value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterization of patients with renal masses. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2010, 46 (4): 275-290.

二级参考文献31

共引文献46

同被引文献64

  • 1Zhou X, Yan F, Luo Y,et al. Characterization and diagnosticconfidence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for solid renal tumors.Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011,37(6):845-853.
  • 2Houtzager S, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, et al. Evaluation ofrenal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Curr Urol Rep,2013,14(2):116-123.
  • 3Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts.Radiology, 1986,158( 1) : 1-10.
  • 4Katabathina V, Garg D, Prasad SR, et al. Cystic renal neo-plasms and renal neoplasms associated with cystic renal diseases inadults: Cross-sectional imaging findings. J Comput Assist To-mogr, 2012,36(6):659-668.
  • 5El-Mokadem I, Budak M, Pillai S, et al. Progression, interob-server agreement, and malignancy rate in complex renal cystsBosniak category [I F). Urol oncol, 2014’32( 1) : 24. e21-24. e27.
  • 6Park BK,Kim B, Kim SH,et al. Assessment of cystic renalmasses based on Bosniak classification : Comparison of CT andcontrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 61(2) :310-314.
  • 7Bosniak MA.The current radiological approach to renal cysts.Radiology,1986,158(1):1-10.
  • 8Jung DC,Oh YT,Kim MD,et al.Usefulness of the virtual monochromatic image in dual-energy spectral CT for decreasing renal cyst pseudoenhancement:a phantom study.Am J Roentgenol,2012,199(6):1316-1319.
  • 9Tappouni R,Kissane J,Sarwani N,et al.Pseudoenhancement of renal cysts:influence of lesion size,lesion location,slice thickness,and number of MDCT detectors.Am J Roentgenol,2012,198(1):133-137.
  • 10Mileto A,Nelson RC,Samei E,et al.Impact of dual-energy multi-detector row CT with virtual monochromatic imaging on renal cyst pseudoenhancement:in vitro and in vivo study.Radiology,2014,272(3):767-776.

引证文献9

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部