摘要
董学文先生的批评文章曲解海德格尔与实践存在论美学的关系,力图把实践存在论美学的基础——马克思存在论思想曲解为海德格尔的存在论思想,并力图以唯心主义和存在主义来定位海德格尔学说,以此排斥实践存在论对海德格尔学说的有益吸收,这在学理上是站不住脚的,而且董学文先生对存在论概念的理解存在着诸多错误,如把存在论归为唯心主义,认为存在论是反认识论的,把存在论与世界观和宇宙观概念相混淆。在对马克思主义解读问题上排斥任何从新的视角上的理论探索,这本身就不符合马克思主义。
The critical article by DONG Xue-wen misinterprets the relationship between Heidegger and the practical ontological aesthetics.Mr.DONG not only attempts to misinterprets the basis of practical ontological aesthetics——Marx’s ontological thoughts as Heidegger’s ontological thoughts,but also tries to define heidegger’s theory as idelism and existentialism,so as to exlude the useful absorption of practical ontological aesthetics from Heidegger’s theory.This is untenable in theory.Besides,there are many mistakes in DONG Xue-wen’s understanding of the concept of ontology.For example,classifying ontology to idealism,regarding ontology as being anti-epistemological,and confounding the concept of ontology with that of world view.He holds that the arbitrary and dogmatic attitude on interpreting the Marxism and rejects any new perspectives on theoretical exploration,which are not consistent with the Marxism.These are our fundamental differences with DONG Xue-wen.
出处
《北京联合大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2012年第3期71-77,共7页
Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
