期刊文献+

中国企业文化概念范畴的本土构建 被引量:42

Indigenous Characteristics of Chinese Corporate Culture Conceptual Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究的目的是要探索中国背景下的企业文化维度特征,构建一套适合中国本土情景的企业文化概念范畴,为中国企业文化的理论研究、量表开发及模型建构奠定概念基础。我们通过设计一个开放式问卷调研的归纳性分析和一个典型文本的内容分析,探讨中国情境下企业文化的概念维度。从收集的定性数据中,一共得到中国企业文化的12个概念维度,比较分析结果表明,中国与西方国家企业文化的概念范畴既有相同之处,又存在显著的差异,这进一步表明中国企业文化开展高水平本土化研究的必要性。 The purpose of this study is to identify China's indigenous conceptual dimensions of corporate culture,to increase the knowledge and comprehension about corporate culture in specific context,and to promote the theory development and model structure.The first study employs an inductive approach to identify culture dimensions.Based on a practical investigation on corporate culture of China,and additionally a conclusive analysis,we collect 1388 corporate culture sample scenarios from the open-ended investigations on 349 CEOs(or business vice president).After examining the quantitative data,12 dimensions are identified for China's corporate culture,out of which 8 are similar to their western counterparts,and the other 4 are totally unmentioned in the western literatures.In the second study,we conduct a content analysis of corporate culture document,and find the outcome of the first study creditable and steady.Through the comparative study,some peculiar dimensions in China and the absent western equivalents in the west are unfolded.
作者 徐尚昆
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期124-132,共9页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71102106) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(09YJC630222)
关键词 企业文化 概念范畴 本土构建 corporate culture conceptual paradigm indigenous characteristic
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Pettigrew., A. M. On Studying Organizational Cultures[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979,24(4):570-581.
  • 2Cheng, J. L. C. On the Concept of Universal Knowledge in Organization Science: Implications for Cross-nation Research[J]. Manage- ment Science, 1994,40(4):162-168.
  • 3Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D. et al. Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(4):718-796.
  • 4Anne S. Tsui. Contributing to Global Management Knowledge: A Case for High Quality Indigenous Research[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2004,21 (4):491-513.
  • 5Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Sanders, G. Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study across Twenty Cases[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(2):286-316.
  • 6Tayeb, M. Organizations and National Culture: Methodology Considered[J]. Organization Studies, 1994,15(3):429-447.
  • 7Eisenhardt, K. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550.
  • 8I-Iinkin, T. R. A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 1998,1(1):104-121.
  • 9Tsui, A. S., Wang, Xin. Organizational Culture in China: An Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types[J]. Management and Organizational Review, 2006,2(3):345-376.
  • 10Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., Lin, S. C. Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(3):421-444.

共引文献17

同被引文献438

引证文献42

二级引证文献311

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部