期刊文献+

药学服务对ICU患者镇静、镇痛治疗的影响

Effects of Pharmaceutical Care on Sedation Analgesic Therapy of ICU Patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨药学服务对ICU患者镇静、镇痛治疗的影响。方法:选取我院2009年9月-2010年8月ICU出院患者160份病历作为基线调研组,2010年10月-2011年11月出院患者161份病历作为药学服务组,研究药学服务对镇静、镇痛治疗方案及药物选择合理性的影响。结果:以镇痛为基础的系统镇静是重症患者镇静、镇痛充分获得的有利方案。系统镇静采用率由药学服务实施前的15.00%上升到实施后的44.72%。ICU患者镇静、镇痛药应用比例由实施前的72.50%上升到实施后的92.55%;镇静、镇痛不足比例由实施前的15.62%下降到实施后的5.58%。结论:恰当的药学服务措施能有效提高重症监护患者镇静、镇痛治疗的效果。 OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pharmaceutical care on sedation analgesic therapy of ICU patients. METHODS: 160 medical records of discharged patients were collected from ICU of our hospital from Sept. 2009 to Aug. 2010 as baseline group, and 161 medical records of discharged patients from Oct. 2010 to Nov. 2011 as pharmaceutical care group. The effects of pharmaceutical care on sedation analgesic therapy and drug selection were studied. RESULTS: Systemic sedation based on analgesics was the most profitable project for ICU patients to obtain sedation analgesia effects fully. The utilization ratio of systemic sedation was increased from 15.00% before intervention to 44.72% after pharmaceutical care. The application rate of sedation anal- gesic drugs was increased from 72.50% before pharmaceutical care to 92.55% after pharmaceutical care; and the proportion of in- sufficient sedation analgesic therapy was decreased from 15.62% before pharmaceutical care to 5,58% after pharmaceutical care. CONCLUSION: Suitable pharmaceutical care can improve the effect of sedation analgesic therapy in ICU patients.
机构地区 珠海市人民医院
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2012年第26期2482-2485,共4页 China Pharmacy
基金 珠海市科技计划项目(2010B040102026)
关键词 重症监护 镇静药 镇痛药 药学服务 Intensive care Sedative drugs Analgesic drugs Pharmaceutical care
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献77

  • 1Schweickert WD, Kress JP. Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation. Critical Care, 2008, 12 Suppl 3 :$6.
  • 2Walder B, Trainer MR. Analgesia and sedation in critically ill patients. Swiss Med Wkly, 2004, 134:333-346.
  • 3Arroliga A, Frutos-Vivar F, Hall J, et al. Use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers in a cohort of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest, 2005, 128:496-506.
  • 4Muellejans B, Matthey T, Scholpp J, et al. Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/ fentanyl: a randomized open-label pharmacoeconomic trial. Crit Care, 2006, 10:R91.
  • 5Wohhuis EK, Veelo DP, Choi G, et al. Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes does not influence the prescription of opioids or sedatives. Crit Care, 2007, 11 :R77.
  • 6[1]William T, Perssible MD FCCM. Sedation of the critically ill: Goals, plans, and cost-effectiveness. Crit Care Med, 1997,25:(12):1942
  • 7[2]Richard R, Riker MD FCCP. Prospective evaluation of the Sadation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med, 1999,27(7):1325
  • 8[3]Judrey Shafer MD. Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens. Crit CarE MEd, 1998,26(5):947
  • 9[4]Bolton HE, Bailey CP. Psychosomatic aspects of cardiovascular surgery(b)surgical aspects. In:Cantor AJ, Foxe AN(eds). Psychosomatic Aspects of surgery. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1956.11,34
  • 10[5]Egerton N, Kay JH. Psychological disturbances associated with open heart surgery. Br J Psychiatry, 1964,110:433

共引文献321

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部