摘要
我国尚没有开发基于我国人群偏好的EQ-5D量表效用值积分体系,目前采用该量表进行的成本效用分析大多是以英国及日本的积分体系计算健康状态效用值。文章通过分析这两种体系对量表中所有状态的预测效用值发现,相比日本的结果,采用英国积分体系所得的效用值较低,且当其用于成本效用分析时更倾向于接受成本较高效用值也较高的治疗方案。研究人员在比较不同研究结果时应充分关注因使用不同积分体系而产生的差异,同时认为鉴于该体系与各国文化背景紧密相连,应尽早开发适合我国人群的EQ-5D量表效用值积分体系。
Because of lack of Chinese value set for EQ-5D, the EQ-5D value sets frnm UK and Japan are mostly used in cost-utility analysis （CUA） in China. The article makes analysis of the utility values of all the health states obtained from these two sets. The results reveal that most of the predictions are lower when calculated from UK value set than those of Japan, and the conelusion of CUA based on the former utility values prefers the treatment with higher cost and higher utility score than the other. The researcher should pay attention to the differences in the results caused by using different value sets. In view of the value set being closely related to different cultural background, it＇s necessary to establish Chinese value set more early.
出处
《中国卫生经济》
北大核心
2012年第7期9-11,共3页
Chinese Health Economics
