期刊文献+

LH750血液分析仪白细胞计数自动纠正功能正误的直方图鉴别法 被引量:2

Histogram appraises the function of WBC auto-correct executed by LH750 hematology analyzer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析LH750血液分析仪白细胞直方图的形态,快速判断仪器白细胞计数自动纠正是否正确,从而在临床实际工作中更好地应用这一特殊功能。方法以中华人民共和国卫生行业标准(WS\T245-2005):《红细胞和白细胞计数参考方法》对有"Cellular Interference"提示的标本进行白细胞手工计数,计数结果与仪器自动纠正后的结果进行对比,挑选仪器误纠正的标本,通过将这类标本的白细胞直方图与有效纠正及正常标本的直方图进行大量对比,找出它们的特征性差异。结果通过对比误纠正与有效纠正标本的白细胞直方图,找到误纠正标本白细胞直方图有代表性的特征。结论通过对有"Cellular Interference"提示标本的直方图的初步判读能有效减少错误的白细胞计数报告。 Objective To appraise the function of WBC auto-correct executed by LH750 hematology analyzer from histogram morphous so as for better clinical application of this ruction. Methods Counted samples that were "cellular interference" accord- ing to "Reference method for the enumeration of erythrocytes and leucocytes", established by the Health industry standard of the People's Republic of China(WS/T245-2005),and compare these results with those auto-corrected by the machine. The comparison data were further processed by statistical analysis. Results They showed some typical characteristics in histograms of inaccurate auto-corrected counts,while comparing the inaccurately corrected WBC histograms with the accu- rately executed ones. Conclusion Fault WBC reports maybe greatly diminish by appraisal histogram created by WBC auto- matlc correction
出处 《中国现代医生》 2012年第18期72-73,75,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 LH750全自动血液分析仪 白细胞计数自动纠正 白细胞直方图 细胞干扰 LH750 hematology system WBC correct WBC histogram Cellular interference
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1全国卫生专业技术资格考试专家委员会.2007全国卫生专业技术资格考试指导:临床医学检验与技术.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:843.
  • 2Pierre RV. Peripheral blood film review:The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential. Clin Lab Med, 2002,22:279-297.
  • 3Novis DA, Walsh M, Wilkinson D, et al. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review:a college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 95141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2006,130:596- 601.
  • 4Lantis KL, Harris R J, Davis G, et al. Elimination of instrument-driven reflex manual differential leukocyte counts. Am J Clin Pathol,2003,119: 656-662.
  • 5Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, et al. The international consensus group for hematology review-suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol,2005 ,11:83-90.
  • 6Bourner G, Dhaliwal J, Sumner J. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzer in a large commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study. Lab Hematol,2005,11:285.
  • 7Igout J, Fretigny M, Vasse M, et al. Evaluation of the Coulter LH750 haematology analyzer compared with flow cytometry as the reference method for WBC,platelet and nucleated RBC count [J]. Clin Lab Hamatol, 2004,26 (1) : 1-7.
  • 8Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition. NCCLS document EP10-A2 , vol 22 ,2002.
  • 9Protocol for evaluation of automated hematology analyzer.ICSH.Clin Lab Heamotal,1984,6:69.
  • 10Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. NCCLS document EP6-A. Vol. 23 ,2003.

共引文献122

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部