期刊文献+

Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon Under Uncertain Climate Change and Elevated Atmospheric CO_2 被引量:11

Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon Under Uncertain Climate Change and Elevated Atmospheric CO_2
原文传递
导出
摘要 Climate change and elevated atmospheric CO2 should affect the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC). SOC dynamics under uncertain patterns of climate warming and elevated atmospheric CO2 as well as with different soil erosion extents at Nelson Farm during 1998-100 were simulated using stochastic modelling. Results based on numerous simulations showed that SOC decreased with elevated atmospheric temperature but increased with atmospheric CO2 concentration. Therefore, there was a counteract effect on SOC dynamics between climate warming and elevated CO2. For different soil erosion extents, warming 1℃ and elevated atmospheric CO2 resulted in SOC increase at least 15%, while warming 5 ℃ and elevated CO2 resulted in SOC decrease more than 29%. SOC predictions with uncertainty assessment were conducted for different scenarios of soil erosion, climate change, and elevated CO2. Statistically, SOC decreased linearly with the probability. SOC also decreased with time and the degree of soil erosion. For example, in 2100 with a probability of 50%, SOC was 1 617, 1 167, and 892 g m^-2, respectively, for no, minimum, and maximum soil erosion. Under climate warming 5 ℃ and elevated CO2, the soil carbon pools became a carbon source to the atmosphere (P 〉 95%). The results suggested that stochastic modelling could be a useful tool to predict future SOC dynamics under uncertain climate change and elevated CO2. Climate change and elevated atmospheric CO2 should affect the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC). SOC dynamics under uncertain patterns of climate warming and elevated atmospheric CO2 as well as with different soil erosion extents at Nelson Farm during 1998-2100 were simulated using stochastic modelling. Results based on numerous simulations showed that SOC decreased with elevated atmospheric temperature but increased with atmospheric CO2 concentration. Therefore, there was a counteract effect on SOC dynamics between climate warming and elevated CO2 . For different soil erosion extents, warming 1 C and elevated atmospheric CO2 resulted in SOC increase at least 15%, while warming 5 C and elevated CO2 resulted in SOC decrease more than 29%. SOC predictions with uncertainty assessment were conducted for different scenarios of soil erosion, climate change, and elevated CO2 . Statistically, SOC decreased linearly with the probability. SOC also decreased with time and the degree of soil erosion. For example, in 2100 with a probability of 50%, SOC was 1 617, 1 167, and 892 g m 2 , respectively, for no, minimum, and maximum soil erosion. Under climate warming 5 C and elevated CO2 , the soil carbon pools became a carbon source to the atmosphere (P > 95%). The results suggested that stochastic modelling could be a useful tool to predict future SOC dynamics under uncertain climate change and elevated CO2 .
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第4期489-496,共8页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.51039007 and 51179212) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
关键词 atmospheric carbon dioxide climate warming soil carbon pools soil erosion stochastic modelling 大气CO2浓度升高 土壤有机碳 气候变化 二氧化碳浓度升高 动态变化 气候变暖 侵蚀程度 动态模拟
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Amthor, J. S. 2001. Effects of atmospheric C02 concentration on wheat yield: review of results from experiments using vari?ous approaches to control C02 concentration. Field Crop. Res. 73: 1-34.
  • 2Booker, F. L., Miller, J. E., Fiscus, E. L., Pursley, W. A. and Stefanski, L. A. 2005. Comparative responses of container?versus ground-grown soybean to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Crop Sci. 45: 883-895.
  • 3Chapman, T. 1998. Stochastic modelling of daily rainfall: the impact of adjoining wet days on the distribution of rainfall amounts. Environ. Modell. Softw. 13: 317-324.
  • 4Craine, J. M. and Gelderman, T. M. 2011. Soil moisture con?trols on temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon de?composition for a mesic grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43: 455-457.
  • 5Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. 1992. Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 6Fantappie, M., L'Abate, G. and Costantini, E. A. C. 2011. The influence of climate change on the soil organic carbon con?tent in Italy from 1961 to 2008. Geomorphology. 135: 343- 352.
  • 7Farina, R., Seddaiu, G., Orsini, R., Steglich, E., Roggero, P. P. and Francaviglia, R. 2011. Soil carbon dynamics and crop productivity as influenced by climate change in a rainfed ce?real system under contrasting tillage using EPIC. Soil Till. Res. 122: 36-46.
  • 8Fuhrer, J. 2003. Agroecosystem responses to combinations of ele?vated C02, ozone, and global climate change. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 97: 1-20.
  • 9Gaumont-Guay, D., Black, T. A., Griffis, T. J., Barr, A. G., Jas?sal, R. S. and Nesic, Z. 2006. Interpreting the dependence of soil respiration on soil temperature and water content in a boreal aspen stand. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 140: 220-235.
  • 10Harden, J. W., Sharpe, J. M., Parton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Fries, T. L., Huntington, T. G. and Dabney, S. M. 1999. Dynamic replacement and loss of soil carbon on eroding cropland. Global Bioqeochem. Cy. 13: 885-901.

同被引文献203

引证文献11

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部