期刊文献+

不同手术方式治疗高危重度前列腺增生症108例临床观察 被引量:6

Clinical observation of different surgical procedures in the treatment of high risk patients with large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia in 108 cases
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨高危重度前列腺增生患者的手术方式及疗效。方法将108例高危重度前列腺增生患者随机分为观察组和对照组各54例,观察组采用经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(TKRP)治疗,对照组采用普通经尿道前列腺电切术治疗,比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果两组患者手术均获得成功。观察组的手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症均少于对照组,所切除腺体重量高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后的Qmax、RUV、IPSS、QOL指标均有明显改善,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 TKRP术具有切除手术时间短、术中出血少、术后并发症少的优点,是高危重度前列腺增生患者的首选治疗方法。 Objective To explore the methods and efficacy of high risk patients with large volume benign prostatic layper- plasia surgery. Methods One hundred and eight cases of high risk patients with large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each of 54 cases, the observation group was treated by the prostatic urethra and plasma bipolar electrosurgical excision procedure (TKRP) treatment while the control group received or- dinary transurethral resection, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared. Results Operation of two groups were successful. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications of observation group were less than those of the control group, the removal of the gland weight of observation group was higher than that in the con- trol group, there were significant differences (P 〈 0.05); Qmax and RUV, IPSS and QOL indicators in both two groups were improved significantly compared with those before treatment, there was significant difference (P 〈 0.05), but there was no sig- nificant difference between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion TKRP is a surgery with short surgery time, less bleeding and fewer complications, is the preferred treatment in high risk patients with large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.
作者 夏飞
出处 《中国当代医药》 2012年第18期35-36,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 前列腺增生症 等离子双极电切术 电切术 经尿道 Benign prostatic hyperplasia Plasmakinetic resection Electric resection Transurethral resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1吴伟江,王行环,王怀鹏,邹伟波,梁晓宇,蔡志高,钟巍巍,邹永锋,袁道彰.经尿道等离子体双极电切与经尿道普通电切对前列腺增生症的疗效比较[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(47):3365-3367. 被引量:102
  • 2顾方六.前列腺增生和前列腺癌在中国发病情况的初步探讨[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1994,15:5-5.
  • 3DESMOND J. A method of measuring blood loss during tran- surethral prostatic surgery [J] JUrot, 1973, 109 (3): 453-456.
  • 4Borborlu PG, Kane CJ, Ward JF, et al. Immediate and post- operative complications of transurethral prostatectomy in 1990s [J]. J Urol, 1999, 162: 1307-1310.
  • 5潘柏年.经尿道前列腺切除术[M]//吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学.济南:山东科学技术出版,2009:1203-1224.
  • 6Botto H,Lebret T,Bane P,et al.Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrue Device[J].J Endourol,2001,15(3):313-316.
  • 7Varkarakis J,Bartsch G,Hominger W,et al.Long-cemL morbidityand mortality of transurethral prosmtectomy:a 10 year follow up[J].Prostate,2004,58(3):248-251.
  • 8Hon NH,Brathwaite D,Hussain Z,et al.A prospective,randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostateresection with plasmagAnetic vaporization of the prostate:physiological chan ges,early complicadom and long-term followup[J].J Urol,2006,176(1):205-209.
  • 9Erturhan S,Erbagci A,Seckiner I,et al.Plasmakinetic resection ofthe prostate venus standard transurethral resection of the prostate:aprospective ran domized trial with 1 year followup[J].Prostate CancerProstatic Dis,2007,10(1):97-100.
  • 10Donovan JL,Peters TJ,Neal DE,et al.A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement:the clasp study[J].J Urol,2000,164(1):65-70.

共引文献131

同被引文献43

引证文献6

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部