期刊文献+

沉积物监测方法和质量基准研究现状及进展 被引量:4

Research on state quo and progress of sediment monitoring method and quality standard
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了中国、美国、加拿大及ISO等国家和组织的沉积物监测方法及质量基准研究现状和进展。我国目前关于地表水沉积物的监测方法尚未形成体系,淡水水体沉积物质量基准研究还处于萌芽阶段,尚无系统的研究,同时对沉积物质量基准评价依据不统一,不能客观反映水体沉积物的质量现状。对此,提出了开展地表水沉积物污染调查,建立符合我国国情的沉积物监测方法体系,尽快制定沉积物环境质量基准,实现对沉积物质量的目标管理等建议。 The state quo and progress of sediment monitoring method and quality standard of China, America, Canada and ISO etc. are introduced. In the light of the problems of imperfect monitoring system on sediment of surface water, immature study of sediment quality standard in fresh water, not unified evaluation basis, the state quo of sediment quality in water body can not be reflected objectively. Therefore, the suggestions are proposed including conducting investigation on sediment pollution of surface water, setting up sediment monitoring method system in line with the national conditions, establishing the environmental quality standard of sediment, implementing target management of sediment quality etc.
出处 《人民长江》 北大核心 2012年第12期78-80,85,共4页 Yangtze River
关键词 沉积物 监测方法 基准 目标管理 sediment monitoring method standard target management
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1陈云增,杨浩,张振克,秦明周.淡水沉积物环境质量基准差异分析[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(3):193-201. 被引量:29
  • 2张曙光,祁世莲,赵玉仙,张军现.多泥沙河流水质评价标准研究[J].人民黄河,1996,18(7):29-33. 被引量:14
  • 3US EPA. Evaluation of the Apparent Effects Threshold (AET)Approach for Assessing Sediment Quality: Report of the Sediment Criteria Subcommittee [ R ]. Washington DC : USEPA, SABEET-FC-89-027,1989 : 11-26.
  • 4Malek J. Apparent Effects Threshold Approach. In: Sediment Classification Methods Compendium [ R ]. Washington DC: USEPA, 1992.
  • 5Cubbage J, Batts D. Evaluation of Freshwater Sediment quality values including Apparent Effects Thresholds of Hyalella azteca and Microtox [ C], Second SETAC World Congress ( 16th Annual Meeting). Pensacola Florida, SETAC Press, 1995,.
  • 6Becker D S, Barrick R C, Read L B. Evaluation of the AET Approach for Assessing Contamination of Marine Sediments in California[ R ]. State Water Resources Control Board Report, 90-3SWQ, Sacramento CA, 1990.
  • 7Alden R WIII, Rule J H. Uncertainty and sediment quality assessments ; II. Effects of correlations between contaminants on the interpretation of apparent effects threshold data [ J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1992, 11 : 654-661.
  • 8Neff J M, Bean D J, Cornaby B W, et aL Sediment Quality Criteria Methodology Validation: Calculation of Screening Level Concentration from Field Data [ R ], Battelle Washington Environmental Program Office for US EPA, 1956.
  • 9Persaud D, Jaagumagi R, Hayton A. Provincial Sediment Quality guidelines[ R]. Water Resources Branch. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario, 1990.7-21.
  • 10Jaagumagi R. Development of the Ontario Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines for Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper,Iron, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, Nickel, and Zinc[ R]. Toronto, Ontario, 1990:3-7.

共引文献30

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部